As someone of the earth sciences it is my opinion that whoever drew this has exactly zero understanding of “natural geographic borders”.
Can you draw us a better map then?
Nobody got time for that. But yeah this map seems to be more or less randomly generated, it messes with a lot of borders that are already geographically defined. Seems like they just made everything into an irregular shape and assumed people wouldn’t look too closely.
US states were in large part created to reflect natural geographic divisions already. They were frequently drawn up on maps before having any significant population centers, so geographical boundaries were the primary focus. A secondary focus being equality, so not making any state too big or small relative to its neighbors.
Right??? This map changes borders that are already based on rivers and natural geographical features.
The fact that the Mississippi River isn’t being used as a border anymore in some states bother me. But I’d love to see your take.
Maps! Bring us the maps!
I know a couple of guys that can help.
Thank you, this makes me happy
100% agree. As an Oregonian, that border on the Willamette made me wanna cry. Literally no consideration of nature or people with that boundary, and yet it’s called a “natural border”.
Looking at Long Island, I find it interesting that they chose the Hudson River as a natural boundary but apparently Long Island Sound is no big deal
I can’t figure out what Rhode Island’s border is meant to be but it apparently doesn’t include Rhode Island
New Jersey is glaringly bad
Eh!!??!! Stay on your side of the 49th parallel!!
Yeah, I see Washington and Montana there. Fuck off with your 54-40 bullshit.
State borders if we sliced through major population centers
I guess it worked for Kansas City, right? Be prepared for NYC NY, vs NYC CT
I get why rivers and creeks and streams were historically convenient borders, but when we started building cities along them it got weird. Then some mf’er invented the bridge and it all went to hell.
Philly? In New Jersey? Are you trying to start riots??
Deleware River that is as wide as a 33+ lane highway is not a natural border? Wacky.
Mine now. We’ll combine it with Atlantic City and make Gotham which will somehow take up like the entire south part of the state together.
Asking the Colonial powers to not make weirdly straight unnatural borders is like asking Russia to stop
invadingoccupying it’s neighbours landThis makes my brain itch, in the best way. Oklahoma got much bigger, I approve.
But it lost its panhandle. Sadge.
You mean the Texas Slavery Ensurer?
But we’re still doing better than Florida, which had so much more panhandle sliced off, all the best bits, like Destin! F that
MA using the dark side of the Force
I still like this version of a natural American borders:
I quad this.
Omg, imagine looking natural & normal
It looks so… gloopy!
I like how some states are basically identical. Florida is a given and NH is just kinda like “what happened to you guys?”
NH missed the opportunity of the Merrimack River as a border…… plus the Saint Laurence Seaway up north, oui?
I find it beautiful. Something in my subcountious doesn’t compute borders in straight line
Kansas looks like a mini map!
What specific geographic borders were used? Or is it just sort of random to look organic?
Looks like watersheds to me
I can definitely see the Mississippi River still, so I don’t think it’s watersheds. Unless they’re using peaks and troughs both. I’m sure there’s a term for it. My understanding of water shed is that it means everything that flows into a river so a river would be in the middle. So the borders of watersheds are more like mountains than rivers.
well the bottom of Georgia has a weird tab sticking out usually because of a river border, so I assume you’re right
Mimel looks like he ate too many shrooms and is having a rough day.
this looks much normaler, but the edgy things are funny.
I really like this for some reason.
It’s so comfy
