• BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Like how granular do we want to get? There was no time for primaries with finding multiple candidates who have time to prepare a platform based on new pollng information (also takes time) on what policies were popular and battling it out for a month which would have cut into campaigning time.

    • affiliate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      joe biden has been in office for almost four years. his approval rating has been low for a while. there was time

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        … He didn’t step down until 3 months before the election, so no there wasn’t time for a primary after he stepped down.

        There was time for him to step down and I think he should have never tried for a second term, but that’s not what the discussion is.

        • affiliate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 days ago

          it looks like we’re mostly on the same page here. maybe the only difference is that i think that joe biden’s refusal to step down was a core part of fucking up the primary. so, for that reason, i think it is an important part of the discussion. there would have been plenty of time if he had stepped down earlier.

          but i’m more-so just trying to clarify my earlier comment. i completely agree with you that there wasn’t time for a primary after he stepped down.

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            You’re not clarifying. When I say “There was no time for a primary.” that is obviously after he stepped down. That you take that to be anything but that, well.

            • affiliate@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              16 days ago

              that’s not immediately obvious to me, since it’s assuming that it was an inevitability that he’d refuse to step down. and there are many reasons why he should have stepped down much earlier.

              but i can also understand your side of things, and i can see how it would be obvious from your perspective. im just trying to share my perspective and clear up a misunderstanding. at the end of the day, it seems like we’re both in agreement about the big picture.

              • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                Really? The timeline we live in is that he didn’t step down until 3 months prior to the election, and that 3 months was the timeline for a primary. I don’t see this going anywhere so I’m out.