Summary

The UK has introduced the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, aiming to make it illegal for future generations to buy cigarettes. The bill proposes gradually raising the minimum smoking age, so those born after January 1, 2009, will never be able to purchase tobacco legally.

It also includes restrictions on vape flavors and packaging to prevent youth addiction and bans smoking in certain outdoor spaces, though pub beer gardens are exempt.

Supported by the Labour Party’s majority, the legislation seeks to create a “smoke-free U.K.” and combat smoking-related deaths.

  • sem
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    I am just wondering who would do all the work of warehousing, distributing, etc., if there was no profit motive.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      Nonprofits can still have paid employees, it’s just that the company doesn’t profit; there’s no owner or shareholders extracting excess value.

      • sem
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        That reminds me of REI in America. They’re technically a member-owned co-op, but they’re definitely a huge corporation making buckets for somebody, probably the leadership. So a non profit version of that

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      The people who do the work already.

      Profit, by definition, is excess. It’s what’s leftover after all other business expenses are paid, including employee wages.

      • sem
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I guess I’m wondering who will hire the people to do that work? I assume a company that is allowed to have profit will be able to offer higher wages to be competitive

        • john89@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          The people who do the hiring are part of a business’ expenses, not its profit.

          They will still be doing their job like they normally do.

          I assume a company that is allowed to have profit will be able to offer higher wages to be competitive

          Where do they get that money? By charging you and I more than what a product costs to produce and bring to market. If people had higher standards (which they don’t), then they would go to the business that gives them the best deal.

          Right now we live in a culture where people are proud to spend more money even if it’s for a worse product. Everything is backwards regarding personal financial responsibility which is why there is so much excess yet most people still think they “need” more money.

          • sem
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            Without a profit motive, where is the incentive to work efficiently? The cost to get goods to market will include the cost of the inefficiencies in the market? The fact that the tobacco is being grown on a small plot instead of huge monocrop, etc.

            How could this compete against a black market that has a profit motive to get costs low so they can take more for themselves

    • cuchilloc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      No one would farm it for profit and no one would import it for profit. Ends up with people still selling it for profit in a black or parallel market.