• thepixelfox@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh sweetheart. Unless you account for a heck of a lot of people. Hundreds to thousands isn’t a very large sample size when you take into account the amount of people with disabilities there is in the world. And you also have to account for figures of people with undiagnosed disabilities too.

    So yes. Your sample size is akin to your IQ.
    Low.

            • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you look back, the people addressing me have been arguing about why I shouldn’t believe my sources, and they’re using nothing but degrading insults and authoritarian arguments to try to sway me. My responses have all been appropriate. Nobody has asked for clarification or explanation. They just read my claims and reacted with their own narcissistic responses. I don’t care if you all remain ignorant of the truth.

                • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Allow me to rephrase for people like you. “I am confident in my research and experience, and I have no desire to explain years of work to the willfully ignorant.”

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    All kinds of people are confident despite being very wrong. Confidence is not a substitute for evidence. Neither is insulting people.