• Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 个月前

    I think we’re going to need to start by defining what “popular” means.

    According to https://fedidb.org/software/lemmy, there are 462,745 total Lemmy users. (Note: I know nothing about this site or their metrics; I literally just Googled “Lemmy users.”)

    If 462,745 people showed up to my birthday party, I would feel like the most popular person on the planet.

    So, I think we need to consider a less abstract figure to answer this. Will Lemmy ever be as popular as a place like Reddit? I think that’s extremely unlikely, at least not anytime soon. But will Lemmy ever be popular enough to sustain an engaged community? I dunno; I kind of think we’re already there.

    Maybe this is the old head in me, but I remember the decentralized days of the early internet, where communities weren’t oceans of people on social media giants, but rather smaller, close-knit forums and message boards. If you spent a few months interacting, you would likely get to know and have specific opinions about individual users that you would regularly engage with, unlike the sort of hit-and-run buzz style of the modern social internet. I think right now, Lemmy is almost treading a special sweet spot between the two eras, and I’m pretty happy with it.

    Although I will concede that I’m as addicted to social media as everyone else is these days, and I would certainly welcome the increase in on-the-minute activity that additional users would bring.

    • FundMECFSResearch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 个月前

      Might consider that a lot of people have alts, maybe even 5+ alts, and there are a lot of bots.

      40,000 monthly active users is probably a more useful number here.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 个月前

        40,000 monthly active users is probably a more useful number here.

        I fully agree. Again, I did not think that the random figure, which I tried to appropriately caveat, was the salient part of my comment.