fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 18 days agoTHANK YOUmander.xyzimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1345
arrow-up1345imageTHANK YOUmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 18 days agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squaregjoel@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up59·18 days agoIs no one going to comment on the “magnified five times under a microscope”? Five times? What kind of weak, low refraction plastic lens, cost of bubblegum microscope are you using to magnify your enormous monster ants?
minus-squareNikelui@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·18 days agoConsidering the size of an ant and the picture, I’d say at least 50x
minus-squaredavidgro@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·18 days agoWhat is this, a magnification for ants?
minus-squareGiveMemes@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·17 days ago400x is more than enough to see and differentiate eukaryotic cells so I feel like 50x might be a slight overshot
minus-squareDrDystopia@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days agoBrowsing on a 32" monitor, “I wonder how they handle cat-sized ants where ever that’s from”.
Is no one going to comment on the “magnified five times under a microscope”? Five times? What kind of weak, low refraction plastic lens, cost of bubblegum microscope are you using to magnify your enormous monster ants?
Considering the size of an ant and the picture, I’d say at least 50x
What is this, a magnification for ants?
400x is more than enough to see and differentiate eukaryotic cells so I feel like 50x might be a slight overshot
Browsing on a 32" monitor, “I wonder how they handle cat-sized ants where ever that’s from”.