• gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    23 days ago

    Field sobriety tests are about as accurate as Tarot readings.

    In most jurisdictions, the police can arrest you for refusing. Some experts say that if you’re sober, it’s better to refuse and be arrested, and then find it in court.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      23 days ago

      Refusing a breathalyzer is expensive though thanks to implied consent. The ticket for that is a ton of points.

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        23 days ago

        If you’re sober you should absolutely agree to the breathalyzer and the blood test.

        It’s the field tests that are bogus.

      • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 days ago

        What? You have to pay for the blood test if you refuse the breath analyzer? Everyday I learn something new about the US and everyday I’m shocked about it.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 days ago

          Not sure if you have to pay for the blood test (it wouldn’t surprise me), but part of driving on a public road is consenting to a breathalyzer test. They do need a warrant to draw your blood against your will, but they may bully the hospital into doing it anyway. Refusing to take one is a crime that in combination with any other violation can get your license suspended.

          It may be worth going that route if you are marginally over the limit and a few hours would sober you up.

    • iMastari@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      If I refuse a field sobriety test and request s breathalyzer or blood test instead, would I still be arrested?