• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I already said that. They took Ukrainian grain and shipped it to Moscow.

    The 4 million Ukrainian Slavs dead still isn’t greater than the 20 million Slavs killed by Hitler.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I already said that. They took Ukrainian grain and shipped it to Moscow.

      You said

      And the Holdomor was a famine not caused by Stalin.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          17 hours ago

          And the Soviets continued exporting grain from the Soviet Union itself, not just Ukraine, during the famine. Enough to feed millions of people. This was a choice made by Stalin.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            16 hours ago

            You are right! I’m am sorry.

            I still stand by my statement that Hitler killed more Slavs than Stalin.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Yeah, that’s probably true, unless one wishes to subject a certain percentage of the deaths in WW2 to Stalin’s decisionmaking. That would, by my count, be unfair, even though Stalin’s shares some responsibility for splitting Poland with genocidaires, letting the Nazis sucker-punch the USSR, and then a series of questionable decisions in defense of the Soviet Union. Ultimately, Hitler is the one at primary fault for the those deaths.

              • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                You could also argue that without the rapid industrialization , payed for in Ukrainian blood, during the 1930s that stalin ordered the soviets wouldve lost the war. They at least wouldve probably had to retreat past the urals for a few years until the u.s. could ramp up and save them. Considering nazi plans for Russia, what hitler wouldve done with even those couple years would make holodomoor look like a picnic.

                The soviets were barely able to hold back the nazis even after a huge boom in industrial productivity under the 5 year plans. If they had kept at there earlier pace of industrialization they wouldve been blown out of the water.

                Stalin probably made a lot of strategic mistakes, but even if the soviets had a military genius leading them, if they don’t have the tanks and guns to back up those strategies they still wouldve lost.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 minutes ago

                  You could also argue that without the rapid industrialization , payed for in Ukrainian blood, during the 1930s that stalin ordered the soviets wouldve lost the war. T

                  Pretty sure the Holodomor wasn’t necessary to the rapid industrialization of the Soviet Union.

                • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Yeah, Stalin def could have handled defence better - but years matter in a war enormously, without Russian cannon fodder Nazis would have had the time to solidify power & the fighting in the west would have been significantly worse (or perhaps even stop with Germany victorious), Hitler was basically counting on Stalin to stop or stop being able to defend USSR at such a cost to lives, that was the actual plan.