• Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        I agree with the poster below, in that they’re ambiguous terms used interchangably, descriptive linguistics and whatnot. But in my brain, they’re hard coded as couple=2, few=3, several=4+, a bunch= 10 or more, but not 12. Can me 10, 11, 13+, but can’t specifically be 12. That’s a dozen.

        • criitz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          I agree with these, except I would use a bunch to mean as low as say, 5 or 6. Like a bunch of bananas at a grocer.

          • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            I could get behind this. The low end of a bunch isn’t as clearly defined in my head as the others. So long as it isn’t precisely 12, it’s okay. Lol. Also, 6 is often “half dozen” but not always.

      • criitz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        Haha, sorry! I know people like to give very specific meanings to words like a few, several, or some, but colloquially to me they are intentionally ambiguous and all basically mean “a small amount, more than 2”

    • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      TBF, even three “generations” in that span assumes parenthood by 28 (2021: 30, FYI), and 4+ generations by 7 years apiece — putting it well beyond reality “by any reckoning”.