The platform’s billionaire owner has seen its value plunge as advertisers run shy, revenues drop and user numbers fall

Two years ago, there was some trepidation among advertisers, anti-hate-speech groups and staff about Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter.

Those concerns have been borne out: advertisers have sharply reduced spending on the platform, Musk has sued nonprofits over their coverage of a rise in controversial content and about eight out of 10 employees have been sacked.

The service, now rebranded as X, is not worth the $44bn Musk paid for it on 27 October 2022 – later tweeting “the bird is freed” in a reference to its corporate logo. The plunge in value reflects the damage done to its advertising-dependent business model.

But its continued influence as a news source and its role as an outlet for broadcasting its owner’s rightwing views to his 200 million-plus followers, means the benefit to the world’s richest person does not need to be measured in financial benchmarks alone.

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Will people please stop calling Twitter a fucking news source!? At best it’s a news aggregator, and even that’s a stretch. It does not create news content that isn’t about itself. It is not, and has never been a news organization.

    ETA: just because a disturbing number of people think what they get from twitter (or Meta, Google, Insta, TikTok, etc.) is news doesn’t make it so. It’s like saying creationism is science because someone added “theory of” to the name.