• SnowdropDelusion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not a “personal insult,” it’s my direct observation of what you are actively doing based on my perspective.

    • bauhaus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      no, it’s just an personal attack because you can’t back up your claim

      • SnowdropDelusion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I made the claim you are arguing in bad faith because from my perspective that is exactly what you are doing.

        I state your original claim is untrue, then you tell me your statement should be interpreted as she was asleep before police woke her up. Then I present solid evidence that she was watching a movie. Then you move the goalpost and claim my evidence isn’t explicit enough for you. You also present no counter evidence. I then call you out on arguing in bad faith.

        How else am I supposed to interpret what you are doing? From my perspective it seems obvious you are just trying to win an argument rather than get to the truth of the matter.

        From my perspective, I am the person saying “We found these facts. care to respond?” and you are the person replying “Everything in the media is FAKE NEWS!”

        • bauhaus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          you’re making personal attacks because you can’t prove your claim that:

          I state your original claim is untrue

          and that’s your problem, not mine. making up lies about what I’ve said is just taking things worse.

          • SnowdropDelusion@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What are you even saying? The text thread is all there. There are no “lies” to be found in my comments. This is clearly an actual ad hominem attack.

            • bauhaus@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              if you can’t tell what I’m saying after all of my comments, that’s not my problem. ive been perfectly clear.

              • SnowdropDelusion@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah, this is definitely a bit confusing. I think I replied to you on multiple threads and also wrongfully assumed you were the original poster of the graphic. I apologize for any frustration that added to the situation.

                Edit for any future readers: Upon closer look, “bauhaus” and “BrooklynMan” have extremely similar looking profiles pictures, banners, and writing styles. On brief inspection, it looks like the images in particular were generated by AI. It’s not a smoking gun per se, but it seems sketchy.