• Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Imagine if all those people stood together against genocide instead of dividing over it. Women alone are like half the population… Why are they siding with genocide? They could elect anyone they want. Anyone with health insurance? That’s almost everyone. Bam, anyone they want. If a gay person votes for genocide how much should I really give a shit about them? There’s no “meaningful choice” because the libs get out early saying so… But if it’s not this election then certainly by the next one, millennials and zoomers are gonna be done with the old boomer parties… And good riddance

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I can imagine. Let’s say all these groups unanimously decided not to vote for democrats. Then they ask who they do vote for.

      Feminists vote for the best feminist candidate they can find. BLM votes for the best civil rights candidate they can find. LGBTQ people vote for the queerist person they can find. None of them support genocide, but none of them are voting for the same person.

      Now Trump wins with the vote split 40/20/20/20. Great job, we overwhelmingly voted against genocide and it only got worse.

      There is no anti-genocide option on the table. It is not a real choice.