As the AI market continues to balloon, experts are warning that its VC-driven rise is eerily similar to that of the dot com bubble.

  • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    316
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just a reminder that the dot com bubble was a problem for investors, not the underlying technology that continued to change the entire world.

      • FMT99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not that you’re wrong per-se but the dotcom bubble didn’t impact my life at all back in the day. It was on the news and that was it. I think this will be the same. A bunch of investors will lose their investments, maybe some adventurous pension plans will suffer a bit, but on the whole life will go on.

        The impact of AI itself will be much further reaching. We better force the companies that do survive to share the wealth otherwise we’re in for a tough time. But that won’t have anything to do with a bursting investment bubble.

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          95
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lots of everyday normal people lost their jobs due to the bubble. Saying it only impacted the already rich investors is wrong.

          • Candelestine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Lots or some? I’d say “some”.

            edit: Really, though. How many people lost their jobs? Obviously, this being a techy space, anecdotes will lean towards people knowing someone personally. Tech people know other tech people.

            But in a country of 300 million, how many people was it? Was unemployment significantly moved by it? No, it was not, because for the most part the websites that failed did not employ very large numbers of people, and there were other jobs available in the field.

          • ZagTheRaccoon@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There really isn’t much that can harm rich people that won’t indirectly do splash damage on other people, just because their actions control so much of the economy that people depend on for survival.

        • kitonthenet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          49
          ·
          1 year ago

          The dotcom bubble was one of the middle dominos on the way to the 2008 collapse, the fed dropped interest rates to near zero and kept them there for years, investor confidence was low, so here come mortgage backed securities.

          In addition, the bubble bursting and its aftermath is what allowed the big players in tech (Amazon, Google, Cisco etc) to merge to monopoly, which hasn’t been particularly good

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. Note how we’re having this conversation over the web. The bubble didn’t hurt the tech.

      This is something to worry about it you’re an investor or if you’re making big career decisions.

      If you have a managed investment account, like a 401(k), it might be worth taking a closer look at it. There’s no shortage of shysters in finance.

    • MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In Canada, a good example is cannabis industry. Talk about fucking up opportunities.

      Why would it be any different with tech?

      It’s about the early cash-grab, imo.