• polar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What current situation?

    1. Is so hard to believe Open Source should be open? If there were a malicious intent, others would have been able to detect it in no time… because it is ‘open’! If the open system works, it should not matter there are CIA or FSB, commies or libertarians “infiltrated” making the code.

    2. If those Russians had been in that position is because their contributions have been stellar, otherwise they would never have gotten there. Their contribution and effort has been robbed from them just because they mothers give them birth in the wrong coordinates.

    3. Linus is a god for many of us… with human traits though… His Finland, although historically robbed by Russia, achieved its highest splendor during the decades of neutrality, not by fiercely antagonizing one or the other power… same as Switzerland, Ireland, Austria and Singapore.

    4. All this started with a US law so he has to comply with. However, instead of those unhelpful comments, he should say that in open software it is unwarranted… not to mention countries can get sanctions for their actions, but not civilians that cannot choose where they are born.

    5. If we are to believe that Moscow is trying to put something into the kernel “undetected”… gosh, what an organization based on the US with a so pro-establishment leader may be doing so? For real, now I am starting having my doubts on the kernel!

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      you lost me at this

      If there were a malicious intent, others would have been able to detect it in no time… because it is ‘open’!

      not sure if troll or just really ignorant.

    • polar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      My very fist post on lemmy and already see the upvote downvote game… When someone votes should be demanded a public reason, no?