I see that it can be slower because of having all the dependencies included with the flatpak itself instead of relying solely on whats installed on the system. I read that this means it isolates or sandboxes itself from the rest of the system.

Does this not mean that it can’t infect the rest of the system even if it had malware?

I have seen people say that it isnt good for security because sometimes they force you to use a specific version of certain dependencies that often times are outdated but I’m wondering why that would matter if it was truly sandboxed and isolated.

Do they mean that installing flatpak itself is a security risk or that also specific flatpaks can be security risks themselves?

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 天前

    There are vulnerabilities found in Flatpak’s sandboxing all the time so it’s pretty much broken. The opening speed on HDD systems is really really bad too. That’s why I only use Flatpak to install software that’s not available in my distro’s repos. Though I use Arch (btw) so distro packages being old isn’t an issue for me.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 小时前

      Do you have current proof that there is security problems in the current stable version of Flatpak? Nothings perfect but bubblewrap should be pretty solid.

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 小时前

        Well the sandboxing does help with trustworthy browsers so the websites can’t have excessive permissions. But relying on such a broken system isn’t a very good idea imo.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 小时前

          Sandboxing in the browser is different than the sandboxing done by flatpak.

          You really want your browser sandbox to be rock solid as any weakness allows for drive by attacks by websites.

          Flatpak uses bubblewrap under the hood so it is just as secure. Flatpak also has a security tracker and when security issues are found they are taken very seriously.

    • someonesmall@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 天前

      It’s still better than no sandbox at all, isn’t it? And who installs their OS on an HDD in 2024?

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 天前

        It’s still better than no sandbox at all, isn’t it?

        I guess so.

        And who installs their OS on an HDD in 2024?

        Those who earn less than $5k a month (aka 80+% of people in the world).

        • pmc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 小时前

          Nearly all of my friends make less than $5k per month, and all of them have SSDs as the boot drive in their computer.

          • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 小时前

            Yes. 1TB SSDs can be bought new for 50€, 500GB for even less. For some people this is expensive depending in the region (e.g. I also know someone who uses an HDD). But given the price of other pc parts it isn’t something to cheap out on (a 1TB/2TB HDD is also 50€).