I see that it can be slower because of having all the dependencies included with the flatpak itself instead of relying solely on whats installed on the system. I read that this means it isolates or sandboxes itself from the rest of the system.

Does this not mean that it can’t infect the rest of the system even if it had malware?

I have seen people say that it isnt good for security because sometimes they force you to use a specific version of certain dependencies that often times are outdated but I’m wondering why that would matter if it was truly sandboxed and isolated.

Do they mean that installing flatpak itself is a security risk or that also specific flatpaks can be security risks themselves?

  • cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    30 days ago

    Go to flathub and check the permission of the application that you want to install. Normally they won’t have access to root directory, but could access your home dir. If they had any malicious intent, they could mess with your personal files.
    I think there is another application that can restrict the permission scope on flathub itself.

    • Ashley@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      30 days ago

      Also flatpaks are moving away from file system permissions towards portals. Though currently I wouldn’t see flatpak as much of a security measure.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      Most flatpaks don’t have full access. You can grant permission via the file picker. (It happens automatically)