• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Being labeled as Satoshi Nakamoto is basically a fucking death sentence due to how much money is on the line. It feels deeply irresponsible of HBO.

    • itslilith
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Very likely not him, and he’s like the 20th candidate whose been paraded by the news

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        12 hours ago

        He potentially has billions of dollars in bitcoin

        Bad people do bad things for big sums of money

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            You can’t torture the money away from most billionaires. Someone who has most of their wealth in Bitcoin theoretically could have that happen to them.

            And after stealing the money, there’s not that much chance of getting caught, unlike if you just tried putting billions into your regular ass bank account.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Other billionaires also have security. The accused people who aren’t really Satoshi likely don’t have the means to properly protect themselves the same way.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Satoshi could liquidate 4.76% of all the bitcoins that will ever exist, that would wipe the crypto market and potentially bring the stock market along for a very bumpy ride, wipe a ton of money in pension funds and so on.

            The fact that one person owns that much Bitcoin should worry anyone who is invested in it.

          • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Yes but having billions in Bitcoin more closely resembles having billions in cash than billions in stocks / other assets which are harder to steal and get away with.

            • itslilith
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Ironically, that’s the kind of “issue” you need trustworthy banks for. The thing crypto was meant to replace. But none of the crypto exchanges that exist are trustworthy enough

              • Sabin10@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I still don’t understand why crypto exchanges exist is an unregulated, decentralized currency, wouldn’t an exchange remove part of those benefits?