A new poll suggests that Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein is drawing more voters from former President Donald Trump than from Vice President Kamala Harris.

According to a Noble Predictive Insights survey released last week, Harris holds a narrow lead over Trump in a hypothetical three-way race. With Stein on the ballot, Harris’ lead expands, pointing to a potential spoiler effect similar to what many Democrats blamed Stein for doing to Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

For Trump, the emergence of Stein as a potential spoiler may be a critical factor in battleground states, where even a small shift in votes could determine the outcome. For Harris, Stein’s candidacy could paradoxically provide an unexpected advantage, drawing votes from Trump and narrowing his pathway to victory.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    You’re allowed to do whatever you want, I just want you to understand that you’re choosing to literally do nothing 🤷‍♂️ you’re not making a stand, you’re not sending a message, and you’re not enacting change. You’re voting for Donald Trump while making yourself feel like you’re fighting an ideological battle.

    • Naryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not even fucking American 😂. I just believe that people have the right to stand and vote for a legitimate candidate.

        • Naryn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          Of course they are

          Not being likely to win doesn’t make them illegitimate.

          The UK is a FPTP system with 7.5 significant parties

          • Ledivin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The UK is a FPTP system with 7.5 significant parties

            … I’m not sure how to break this to you, but the UK is a monarchy and has literally never elected their leader.

            FPTP isn’t nearly as problematic in a system with distributed representation like Parliament, the Senate, or the House. It is massively problematic when electing a singular leader.

            • Naryn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              It is massively problematic when electing a singular leader.

              No, it’s not. That’s how all of the elections you just listed work. That’s how first past the post works.