• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think you’re imagining these unions to be bigger than what they would be. A library economy is where all nonperishable goods are exchanged at a library. There’s no market to be positioned in. Each union represents their workplace, and these unions coordinate their production to meet the mutual needs of both communities. The unions have a very narrow scope, limited to what the workers produce and have the right of free association. The work needed to protect the environment would be managed by the entire community based on their ability to do so.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I guess I don’t understand how they wouldn’t grow to large size. And I still don’t understand what oversight ensures the Library(s) has safe goods (since history has shown that some people are cut from selfish cloth).

      Is there anything I can read to learn more about your position? I don’t think I grasp it from your short explanation

      • gdog05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you’re implying that a union that makes food will have more power than a union making secondary or luxury goods, well, yeah. You’re totally right that’s exactly what would happen. But, it’s all equal because they both have 873 members.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean, even if we accept the premise that all products are inherently equal in value, who is making sure the leadership or the union more generally is acting in good faith?

          I like the general outline, but I’m struggling to envision how it prevents capitalism from working its way into what look to be, from my lay-perspective, proto-corporations.

          • gdog05@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I was being facetious. I personally don’t feel like that is a workable system. Don’t get me wrong, neither is capitalism at the scale it’s at, especially. I’ve not seen a system that I think would work beyond a state level.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Introducing “value” is already the start of the slippery slope towards capitalism, IMHO.

            Ithink a lot would be already gained if you have a usufruct system of commons.