• atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    157
    ·
    1 month ago

    So, the EU banned these trucks because they present a danger to pedestrians, and someone modded one with rubberized bumpers to get it registered. That’s it. That’s the story.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    1 month ago

    If I see one in europe im going to vandalize it.

    We didn’t need your f150’s and we don’t need this. If you love american cars so much just fucking move you complex filled husk of a man.

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    1 month ago

    There is no overlap in the venn diagram of people who want a Cybertruck and people who consider pedestrian safety when buying a personal vehicle.

    Actually, is there anyone that makes vehicle purchasing decisions considering pedestrian safety scores?

    • WxFisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, because no one intends to hit a pedestrian with the car they are buying. That’s why we need to mandate safer vehicles, not trust people to factor that in as they look for a car.

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        I say build in spring loaded spikes that impale the driver in the event of a collision with a pedestrian. Since the cyber truck pretty much has that facing the pedestrians, if the driver is faced with the threat as well maybe they’ll be more careful with their driving.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’d say auto stop features and multiple camera views on reverse are a good selling point of a car. I certainly regret not getting the overhead camera view on the vehicle I purchased (and the blind spot indicators which don’t apply to pedestrians).

        I’d also like to see the infra-red windshield overlays make it out of the prototype stage. This night vision/heat vision feature helps to alert you to deer, dogs, wildlife, and those dumb asses that insist on walking down the road at night in dark clothing in my neighborhood.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Doesn’t the existence of this modded truck prove that statement wrong? Because I’m pretty sure you made the only statement explicitly refuted by the existence of this truck.

      Congratulations?

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s not actually any safer, they taped thin rubber strips over the exposed edges. Someone’s friends with an inspector who played dumb, me thinks.

    • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Parents, maybe? They are usually so concerned about children’s safety, whether that’s their kids or someone else’s.

  • atempuser23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    Article sucks. Buried the lead that so few of these trucks are registered that they are individual exemptions for them. Just like how you can build your own car from the ground up and get it registered.

    • _core@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Easy, domestic auto producers bribe politicians to make it illegal for foreign automakers to compete in the US because if it were alllowed, domestic automakers would get destroyed.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think it would be difficult to get the IMV up to compliance with US regulations. If they’re selling it in Mexico, it’ll be required to have airbags. The hood looks long enough to have engineered in proper crumpling in a crash. Things like backup cameras might require a little bit of retooling, but that’s not actually super expensive compared to the other expenses of officially bringing it in: the 25% import tax, a parts and service network, etc.

      So it’s a business decision not to even try to get it into the U.S., informed by those regulations.

      In contrast, something like a kei truck wouldn’t be easy to get street legal as a new car in the US: no crumple zone and higher center of gravity are more fundamental safety issues that can’t easily be engineered around.

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        In contrast, something like a kei truck wouldn’t be easy to get street legal as a new car in the US: no crumple zone and higher center of gravity are more fundamental safety issues that can’t easily be engineered around.

        Meanwhile every landscaper is buying brand new Isuzu trucks that are just larger version of kei trucks. The reason they arent legal isnt saftey, but it would eat into the profits of the big 3.

  • purrtastic@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    I haven’t read wired in a few years, and it looks like I haven’t missed anything.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I love the dacia spring mentioned in the article 😍 most price efficient car out there 😁 it is lightweight and max power is just enough 👌🏻

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        🤣as if I would care how a car looks 😅 what does it change? You see it from the inside, mostly. And personally I don’t think it is ugly, so your statement is wrong. You may say you think it is ugly which is an opinion that anyone is allowed to have. Saying it is ugly is said as fact, which is not possible for ugly/beautiful, since those can not be scientifically measured.

    • MY_ANUS_IS_BLEEDING@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wow that looks like a generic imitation car from a video game or low budget movie that can’t afford to licence real cars.

      Also its performance is something else… Power 45 bhp, top speed 78 mph, max range 140 miles, 0-60 19 seconds. Kudos to Dacia, I didn’t know it was even possible to make an electric car that slow.

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        You know not everyone needs to accelerate to 100km/h in less than 5 seconds. The car for its asking price is fine. It is a nice car for someone who is living in a small city and needs it for occasional errands.

        You know not everyone can afford and/or need 40-50K cars.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think 78 mph is about 130 km/h? If so, it is max speed allowed here and I have no money to pay for speeding 🤷🏻 best prevention: having a car not able to speed 😂🫢i lost so much money with my last car…