• originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    3 months ago

    but its unilever. they have nearly unlimited funds to fight musk… if they wanted to

    i suspect they just didnt want the unilever name and its bazillion brands brought into public lawsuits for marketing reasons

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh, I know nothing about Unilever specifically, you may be right. In either case, the basic “Cost not worth the price” reasoning still applies.

          • rmuk@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, I was like, “Wow, I didn’t know Slim Fast was from Madrid. Wow, I didn’t know Slim Fast was from Vladivostok. Wow, I didn’t know Slim Fast was from Anchorage. Wow, I’d didn’t know Slim Fast was from Tiksi. Wow, I didn’t know Slim Fast was from Chihuahua. Wow, I didn’t know Slim Fast was from Jaipur. Wow, I didn’t know Slim Fast was from Alert…”

            “Waaaaiidaminute…”

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, I mean, that’s the gist of it. Corporations are utterly amoral and value only profit, not things like “not helping genocide along” or “preventing fascism”.