• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Agreed. Overall, I just think the restrictions in the beginning were too onerous for most here.

    Masking would’ve been the cheap, smart way to do a thing to lower the amount of spread without having to (god forbid) stay in your house for a little while or do anything to improve your business.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Correct, distributing and requiring masks was the absolute lowest hanging fruit. But we’ve seen what other countries that fared far better than we did implemented.

      Vietnam mobilized their police and others to help with the safe running of local restaurants and deliver hot, fresh food to locked down communities, this made people more accepting of lockdowns. China built hospitals in areas that were at risk of being overwhelmed and added UV filters+better airflow to schools and public places.

      The CDC has insane powers, a century ago they were going apartment by apartment, kicking down doors to vaccinate everyone in NYC. It’s crazy that we accept them not mandating businesses have a certain amount of airflow based on the number of people inside.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The American public has been poisoned against all of the stuff you talked about other countries doing and at this point it believes everything besides having a cop smother you to death because you slept outside on a park bench is a communism. I’m being hyperbolic, but only a little.