• gomp@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If the US or EU want to keep up, they can sunbsidize EV manufacturing to the same degree

      You can’t allow dumping-inducing subsidies without also allowing defensive tariffs, otherwise the richer and more authoritarian countries, which have greater capacity for subsidies and greater ability to concentrate them in specific sectors, will easily kill foreign competition and establish monopolies.

      The marketplace brah is a place where, without regulations that maintain a degree of fairness, the rich kills the poor, competition dies off, and consumers are drained to their last cent.

      Just think of it: competition is when different actors fight it off and it ends the moment one of the contenders wins.
      If you want the fight to go on forever, you don’t want an unregulated market.

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is the market place, brah.

      Free market capitalism

      then talk about subsidies or non capitalist country controlling the currency, markets, VCs, etc.

      What does that even mean?

        • buzz86us@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah I find it a ridiculous parallel I recently saw an article that put a number on Chinese EV subsidies and it seemed extremely low compared to the barrels of money we’ve been giving the oil companies.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Last I checked US prints money like there’s no tomorrow for shit like wars, but as soon as it comes to subsidizing something actually useful all of a sudden the concern trolling starts.