• Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I can’t imagine the threshold here isn’t different though. If each of these recalls required hardware modifications Tesla would either hide the data or lawyers would be able to argue they weren’t major safety violations. I think it’s a plus that many things can be fixed expediantly with software updates and the threshold to do so is low.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      NHTSA are the ones who investigate safety issues and issue recall notices. Once they have done that then the manufacturer has very specific legal requirements to follow. Hiding data from them would eventually come to light, and that would be very bad. Look at the diesel emissions scandal for one example. Volkswagen payed billions in fines for that, and a dozen or so employees including the CEO have been indicted. A few have pled guilty and been sentenced to jail.

      • ggppjj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        (Apologies for not otherwise contributing to the discussion, you want “paid” instead of the nautical rope-handling term “payed”.)

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That is only one method for recalls. Many (maybe most) of the Tesla recalls have been voluntary and not mandated by the NHTSA