As a medical user, I really hope she will stick to this if elected. Trump is doing more “leave it up to the states” bullshit except specifically for Florida and no other state.

  • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    Donald Trump signed into law more executive orders than the vast majority of presidents, and yet Biden can’t sign the one executive order that the vast majority of Americans would support?

  • Cheems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    21 hours ago

    In before it gets legalized federally and then some republican states start spouting states rights and continue to arrest people that are following the law.

    • SyntaxTerror@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      37 minutes ago

      You can already see this with legalization in Germany and right-wing controlled Bavaria. I am not sure right now how far they are going, but they are not happy with this and at least try to make consumption as uncomfortable as possible.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 minutes ago

      Do you think buying it from a street dealer isn’t corporatized? Cartels are basically just black market multinationals at this point. If anything, legalization would make it less corporate since you could grow it in your backyard.

      It will seem more corporate once it’s legal, but that’s just because the business is being conducted in daylight.

      Source: Canadian who grows a plant or 2 each summer

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s a plant that grows in the ground, it’ll get about as corporatized as tomatoes. Meaning people will try, but they can’t really stop you from growing legal plants in your garden.

  • LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I remember Biden running on a promise to federally decriminalized Marijuana. Never happened. Don’t expect it to happen under Harris either. Dumb cow laughs about locking up people for profit using less than a gram of weed.

    • philmiworld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Boy, if you had basic civics knowledge as to how a president in the executive branch cannot pass laws himself but requires the legislative branch (Congress) to pass said laws that he would back.

      • Queue
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        We can give weapons to Israel without congressional approval, but not Ukraine.

        We can build a border wall violating federal laws, but we can’t have the DEA approve a plant.

        Seems weird how being unabashedly evil is bipartisan and the patriotic duty of the president and anything good the Democratic candidate has to promise they’ll try to work on Congress with, reaching across the isles of the literal actual fascists known as Republicans.

      • LordGimp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Actually the power of executive orders are very broad, and as of 2024, are beyond any limits of law. Official acts of a sitting president cannot be criminalized. He can absolutely order the FDA to immediately remove Marijuana from schedule 1 status, but he won’t. What carrot would Harris have to dangle in front of us at that point?

        For context, yes, I’m a dem, and yes, I’m voting for Harris, but fuck me I’m tired of such transparent posturing.

        • Queue
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’m voting for Harris since she’s below the age of 65 and a Democrat, that’s all I want.

          What I need is a president who uses the powers given to them by a corrupt SCOTUS to just say “you gave me this loaded gun, make sure you know where I’m going to point it” and then give us more rights than ever before.

          Ensured abortion. Better union rights. Prohibiting book bannings. Better protections for BIPOC and LGBTQ people. Ensuring voting doesn’t get limited due to state lines. Healthcare. Education. Taxing the rich.

          Are we going to get that? Never in a million years, we’ll see the end of the Republic before we see any president use their power grabbing for anything meaningfully good and not taking away rights of citizens.

          Harris could use it for good but probably won’t. Trump will use it for evil. That’s the honest truth.

      • PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Say what you will about the Republicans, at least they get results on their absurd culture war bullshit. Best the Dems can do for the left is ignore us completely and give us Tim Walz as a VP like we should be soooo fucking grateful

  • cybermass@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, this won Trudeau 3 elections, so I’d say it’s a worth it campaigning point.

      • cybermass@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I should clarify to those non Canadians out there; Trudeau did legalize weed after the first election he won.

        It’s just that it was such a popular move I believe it’s the reason he’s been around for so long. It bought a ton of good will with the public.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    Best way to get the young male vote to be honest. Isn’t this part of what made Ron Paul popular?

      • croaker@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ron Paul wasn’t popular because of a racist newsletter. He was popular because the libertarian ideals he espoused were appealing to internet dwellers that hadn’t experienced real life yet.

        • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Man, I’m happy someone else might remember that time on Reddit which I could only call “peak cringe”. Everyone and their mother seemed to love Ron Paul on that site

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Wasn’t that really the days of Digg? I can’t even remember such eons ago…

            I sadly was one of those duped, hot off of reading Atlas Shrugged no less at a more impressionable time in my life. Thank fuck I crawled my way out.

        • smooth_tea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Bit easy to dismiss millions of people because they aren’t cynical or bitter and then equating that to basically being young and dumb. Perhaps reality is what it is because it’s always the Bush’ and Clinton’s, who only marginally affect the status quo, and never the Ron Paul’s, who see inherent issues with the system, or ‘reality’, and at least have somewhat of an inclination to improve it.

      • smooth_tea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        To me, a European, he was one of the very few, if any, candidates that made sense and seemed consistent in how he voted and spoke. And I consider myself to be quite libertarian.

        I don’t really understand your remark to be honest, other than shoehorning the “he made a racist remark” thing into the conversation. Perhaps you could elaborate.

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          The point is that Ron Paul was a true, modern, libertarian in that his “freedom” and “liberty” shtick was always about freedom to do segregation via “freedom of association” and other such nonsense. Ron Paul created the libertarian to fascist pipeline because libertarianism has mever been anything but veiled racism

          • smooth_tea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Your entire theory hinges on a racist remark that he didn’t even write and was possibly unaware of. Unless I’m missing something groundbreaking on page 2 and 3 of that article which I can’t read because it’s paywalled.

            Is there anything Ron Paul did politically that would suggest fascist ideologies? The word is thrown around a lot these days.

            • BakerBagel@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 hours ago

              His company, his newsletter, his name on it. Often tomes racist shot was directly attributes to him. So either he believed in that, condoned it, or felt that racism was a great vehicle to sell his ideology. I’m not sure whoch of those makes him a good person, or makes his ideology not about racism.

              • smooth_tea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 hours ago

                So he was a fascist/racist who spent his entire life in politics without ever showing a sign of that ideology, was he waiting to spring his trap?

                I’m not here to vouch for the guy, I’m just on the outside looking in, but this seems like a bunch of conjecture in its purest form.

                Also, am I reading you correctly that you think racism is a great vehicle to sell the idea of libertarianism?

  • Samvega
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    I love how it’s a bit of a stretch to back legalising a substance which has become legal in a fair number of states without any issue (that I’m aware of).

    How many elections before a candidate is praised for saying something like, “I, unlike the others, am prepared to accept that the populace generally believes that vegetables are part of a healthy diet?”, because we live in a world where the vast majority of candidates are just saying any old stupid shit that is viral on social media.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      without any issue (that I’m aware of).

      Not only that, but states and municipalities have made a killing on taxing it.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think 40 states have medical and 25 have recreational. It’s insane that it’s even a question about federal legalization at this point.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Those states still have dispensaries and grow operations raided all the time, putting people who work at them at risk. There’s also the fact that people like me, who need it for medical use, are breaking both state and federal law by going from Indiana to Illinois to buy it. It could potentially put me in federal prison (probably not, but that is the way things stand legally).

      • Samvega
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        The only way I can explain such stupidity is by assuming malice, e.g.: “We must put endless fear into the poor people. Our decisions are moral, theirs are not.”

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          And because of that possibility for malice, it needs to be federally legal.

          Cops should not be given tools of oppression.

          • Samvega
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            I fear that cops ARE tools of oppression.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              So you don’t give them ways to make it worse for people.

              If there was a law allowing cops to drone bomb places where they decided criminal activity was occurring, I would assume you would want that law gone.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    It would’ve been cool if she said this when she was actively putting people in cages for weed.

    It would’ve been cool if she said this for the past 4 years while she was VP.

    Now she’s saying it for an election. I’m sure she’s legit this time. lol.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      How dare someone change their mind! We should definitely teach her a lesson she won’t forget and be amongst the 3000 people who who vote for Cornel West in November!

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Actions she can’t take until after January 20th? How do you expect people to do that? Or are you really trying to claim that since she hasn’t issued a public apology, she’s definitely lying and hasn’t changed her mind?

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I didn’t say I expected her to legalize it right now nor am i looking for an apology. You’re mocking the other poster and claiming “she’s changed her mind” without any evidence apart from a basic statement from her that could prove to be completely false for all we know (which was the whole point of their comment).

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              23 hours ago

              I’m not mocking anything. The person I responded to said:

              If she actually had a change of heart, she should apologize to the nonviolent victims she chose to prosecute and incarcerate.

              • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                20 hours ago

                That’s what a different user said not the top-level commentor, which is who you were replying to when I replied to you here (though I made a separate reply to you in a different chain so I understand the confusion).

                It would’ve been cool if she said this when she was actively putting people in cages for weed.

                It would’ve been cool if she said this for the past 4 years while she was VP.

                Now she’s saying it for an election. I’m sure she’s legit this time. lol.

                How dare someone change their mind! We should definitely teach her a lesson she won’t forget and be amongst the 3000 people who who vote for Cornel West in November!

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  You’re right. There is confusion. Because you quoted me saying something else in a different conversation thread and claimed that was when I was mocking the person. So you need to make up your mind.

                  Regardless, sarcasm is not the same as mocking someone. It’s a criticism of what they said.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    TBF, “Leave it up to the states” in the context of recreational use is appropriate here. Extending that concept would necessarily include having extremely limited federal regulation, if any at all.

    Medical use, in my opinion, should be federally protected, such that you can acquire medical use cannabis for a uniform set of medical purposes in all states.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 day ago

      100% disagree. First because it puts people in prison for spurious reasons and secondly because it’s a plant. You can literally just grow it in your back yard. And it will grow really easily. It doesn’t even take work.

      You know what will totally fuck you up but is totally legal to own and grow and use? Salvia divinorum. You know what else? San Pedro cactus.

      Even with shrooms, it’s legal to own the spores when you’re talking about psilocybin and Amanita Muscaria is 100% legal. It can literally kill you.

      We don’t even need to go into tobacco.

      How does any of that make sense?

      • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        You know what will totally fuck you up but is totally legal to own and grow and use? Salvia divinorum.

        Salvia is fucking wild. I do not recommend it unless you want to lose your mind for ~10 minutes or so. Like, from sober to “holy shit I’m on the wheel of fortune right now” in an instant.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I only did it once. Apart from tasting absolutely horrible, the trip wasn’t even fun. I was laying on the ground and suddenly I was standing upright and was a cowboy leaning against the porch post of a ranch house. And then I was me again. What was the point?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago
          1. I didn’t cite them as negative examples.
          2. Amanita muscaria can, as I said, kill you.
          3. Let’s see tobacco’s good safety profile.
          • LittleBorat3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I agree on tobacco, maybe some DIY type of vaping is OK.

            The rest is fine and if you consume any of these plants like fly agaric then you just have to know what you are doing.

            Compared to alcohol anamita muscaria may have a better profile.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh I didn’t say it made sense, especially in comparison to other legally produced intoxicants. If things made sense, we wouldn’t have gestures widely.

        But in the nonsensical paradigm, relegating the legal status of a recreational drug to the state level would be appropriate, and most certainly a step in the right direction. More to the point, I don’t see it being possible for the federal government to command nationwide legality of recreational cannabis. This is why I made a separate statement about medical use.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          The federal government doesn’t need to command that though. They can say that it is federally legal but still allow individual states or smaller governmental divisions to make it illegal. That’s not how it should be, but that is how it works with alcohol, which is why there are dry counties and why Utah can regulate the amount of alcohol in its beer and wine.

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s kind of what I was saying. Recreational cannabis would be appropriately handled just like that, while preserving the right of all Americans to receive certain kinds of medical care (Roe) should be federally guaranteed, regardless of what state you live in.

      • Aphelion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        While I complete and totally agree that it should be legalized, or at least federally rescheduled and completely decriminalized, I worry about what happens when it’s federally regulated and taxed.

        If it is federally legalized and taxed, it will likely become the domain of the ATF, who will take over continue kicking in doors and doing raids on anyone who is not a huge corporate grower. Marlboro has already trademarked Marlboro Greens and I’m sure every other tobacco giant has their branding ready.

        Leaving regulation and taxation to each state is probably better long term, otherwise it’s just going to be a corporate cash grab with established local growers and suppliers getting screwed.

        Regardless, it should be completely legal to grow it in your back yard.

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean I would appreciate it if it were federally legal. I live in a state where its legal but I’m employed by the federal government so I can’t use it without putting my job at risk.