• RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    20 dead Mozilla and Firefox products

    Those are rookie numbers!

    –A single Google product manager, probably

  • burgeoning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    3 months ago

    Another day, more Mozilla FUD. I just saw the switched on Linux guy posted some too. They arent a perfect company, but lets not pretend they’re exactly like google or a mini google. It feels almost coordinated to get you to feel like all companies are compromised, so you should just use the popular thing and forget about privacy and security.

    • disguised_doge@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 months ago

      It feels almost coordinated to get you to feel like all companies are compromised, so you should just use the popular thing and forget about privacy and security.

      People are criticizing Mozilla for the ads, tracking, and AI stuff. The stuff Google does. Criticizing Mozilla is not an endorsement of Google, in fact quite the opposite.

    • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It is not really FUD to point out that Mozilla wastes ungodly amounts of money on projects of dubious utility instead of investing it into their browser. Their current trajectory doesn’t inspire much confidence either. Mozilla started to waste even more money on ‘AI’ features nobody asked for.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mozilla doesn’t exist to fund Firefox. Firefox exists to fund Mozilla. It’s been that since the very fucking beginning: Mozilla is a general internet charity that makes money with a browser. It’s always been that way. It never has been any different. I may have to repeat myself: The purpose of Mozilla isn’t to fund Firefox the purpose of Firefox is to be a money-maker for Mozilla’s charitable causes.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          usually you invest in the main product to drive higher returns for diversifying. diversifying first means your baseline is unstable.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            During the google money years the ROI on Firefox was so mind-bogglingly high it would’ve been insanity to drop it all into the browser: It couldn’t possibly have soaked up the sheer amount of resources.

            Meanwhile, yes they did sink a large amount of resources into it in a way a profit-driven company never would have: They designed a whole fucking new programming language to get proper concurrency into the thing. Rust is, in a very real way, a language to write browsers in. That’s its purpose. And then they set the language free because, among other things, you can’t make money with it.

            Sure, lots of those investments tanked. But OTOH you have stuff like pocket which makes money and could probably keep the lights on by itself. If everything but pocket were to fail Mozilla absolutely would have to downsize, would definitely have to scale back its charity spending, rely more on the FLOSS community to actually write code, but it’d continue with the same kind of force as say Blender, which wouldn’t be what it is without its paid staff (both coders and artists) and sidle-hustles (commercial support, training, and cloud services, mostly. Oh, t-shirts and mugs. Don’t forget t-shirts and mugs).

            I guess overall the gripe I have with the “Mozilla should invest more in Firefox” chorus is that it implies “Do you want Mozilla to be way smaller and less capable of shaping the web than it currently is”. People have no sense of the scale of Mozilla, think that it’s running on donations etc.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                There’s a subscription if you want and they’re also earning some money off referrals. In 2022 they made ~80m dollars off all those side hustles, should probably be 100m by now. Selling the default search engine spot is still the biggest number, about 500m. And they have a piggy bank of over a billion.

                • lime!@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  man, i haven’t thought about pocket for like 10 years. i remember being annoyed that they added yet another binary blob to the software.

      • Mbourgon everywhere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        Actually, their new AI thing is actually useful: stays on-device, and summarizes web pages and videos.

        But yes, they could stand to spend more money on the browser, and less on their CEO and other non-browser things.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Enshittification isn’t an overnight thing, red flags are building and it’s important to call it out.

    • corbin@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Mozilla FUD where I said I like Firefox and pointed out how many of the projects continued in some form after Mozilla ended them?

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’re right, they aren’t google. Not for lack of trying though.

      You see posts putting some shade over Mozilla, and your immediate reaction is “it feels almost coordinated”. Well, that may be. But it would be hard to distinguish a “coordinated attack” from a “that’s just the things they’re doing, and there’s report on it” article, no? Especially when most of it can be fact-checked.

      In this particular case, those abandoned projects got picked up by other… sometimes. And sometimes not. But they were abandoned. There’s no denying that.

      If you want some more hot water for Mozilla, since you’re talking about privacy and security, you’d be interested in their recent switch regarding these points. Sure, the PR is all about protecting privacy and users, but looking into the acts, the message is a bit more diluted. And there’s always a fair amount of people that are ready to do the opposite of what you claims; namely discarding all criticism because “Mozilla”, when the same criticism are totally fair play when talking about other big companies.

      Being keen on maintaining user privacy, system security, and trust, is not the same as picking a “champion” and sticking to it until the end. Mozilla have been doing shady things for half a decade now, and they should not get a free pass because they’re still the lesser evil for now.

  • TwitchingCheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 months ago

    Seeing “the source is available here on GitHub”, “the project was forked and is now maintained as (other name)”, etc. after most of these really helps show the difference with Google. Well that and the length of the article, Google has far more deaths under their belt.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    The loss of FirefoxOS was quite a shame at the time, but i can’t say i miss the rest. Servo, on the other hand, is all but dead. Cannot wait to see what the future holds for the project

    • ravhall@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think Firefox OS could have a successful reboot today. JavaScript frameworks were not what they are now, and between react, vue, svelte, and angular, I think we are in a good place.

      I feel electron and tauri have demonstrated how well JavaScript can be used for interface while allowing it to access system resources in a safe way.

      Perhaps it should not be run by Mozilla, though, IMO they should focus on Firefox.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Servo isn’t dead it’s just on slow burn. Also, under the umbrella of the Linux Foundation Europe. As far as Mozilla is concerned it has served its purpose: Prototype stuff that then got included in Firefox to get rid of a quite large amount of technical debt.

      The long and short of it is: Firefox is supposed to make money for Mozilla’s charitable causes. It’s not an end in itself, but a means to an end.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    A forgotten one is webassembly.studio, an in-browser IDE for creating WASM projects with way less pain than other methods. It got discontinued the year I needed it for my school project. It was open source but I failed to rehost it myself and public mirrors only appeared after I spent days trying to make Emscripten work, tore my hair out over WebGL and then finally painfully built the whole thing with CSS (and a bit of JS; yes, it was indeed a disaster).

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Do you still use WASM? I’ve been exploring the space and wasn’t sure what the best tools are for developing in that space.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Nope. But I guess a mirror of WebAssembly Studio would still be the best starting point despite its slow development lately. The WAsm plugin for VSCodium was broken for me too.

        Note that unlike JS, WASM won’t run from file:// URLs; you need to run a local http server or commit to an online repo to run your code. There might be an about:config option to change this but many IDEs (incl. WA Studio, presumably) come with servers for this reason.

  • Jeffool @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wonder if Mozilla would’ve benefitted if something like Hello was still around when the pandemic hit. Hello was a Firefox feature that made video chatting easy. You just needed to click the link.

  • agelord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Imagine my disappointment when I realized “Firefox advance” wasn’t for the Gameboy advance :(

  • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I used the Notes quite a bit and thought it was a mistake to get rid of it. People pay for notes and tasks related sync services, so it could have been a revenue source. I also miss Firefox Panorama

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I felt the firefox send death, used all the time to share quick files with friends, thankfully I discovered litterbox after they killed it.