- cross-posted to:
- anime_titties@mlem.a-smol-cat.fr
- cross-posted to:
- anime_titties@mlem.a-smol-cat.fr
Now balance that with growing it sustainably, and not killing all the wildlife in the process.
Now balance that with growing it sustainably, and not killing all the wildlife in the process.
I don’t think that’s the point, as much as I get off on cheap Brexit shots. It’s about food
It’s about being self sufficient so you don’t have to buy from abroad. That would be sensible were we in or out of the EU.
No. No it would not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_advantage
Is this comparative advantage as in Germany buying most of its energy from a rogue state such as Russia and then getting fucked? That comparative advantage?
No that was called Energiewende and Ostpolitik
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energiewende#:~:text=Russian fossil gas was perceived,through mutually beneficial trade relations.
https://dgap.org/en/research/publications/after-ostpolitik
The TL:DR was to use cheap Russian gas to fuel the energy transition and at the same time use the economical ties to bring Russia aligned politically to the western Europe. Ostpolitik worked to unify west and east Germany so why wouldn’t it work to align a post-soviet Russia?
Here’s why it failed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iUohhHdvoE&t=0
Just to be clear. With current methods the UK would need 0.4 acres of farmland per adult to provide all food.
Most of the land we have, that is undeveloped. Or not already used for farming. Is not usable as farm land.
So while it is a solvable issue. It would take seriose spending on new farming methods. And either a huge increase in food cost. Or a change in how we currently fund food.
Removed by mod