Cards Against Humanity sued SpaceX yesterday, alleging that Elon Musk’s firm illegally took over a plot of land on the US/Mexico border that the party-game company bought in 2017 in an attempt to stymie then-President Trump’s attempt to build a wall.

“As part of CAH’s 2017 holiday campaign, while Donald Trump was President, CAH created a supporter-funded campaign to take a stand against the building of a Border Wall,” said the lawsuit filed in Cameron County District Court in Texas. Cards Against Humanity says it received $15 donations from 150,000 people and used part of that money to buy “a plot of vacant land in Cameron County based upon CAH’s promise to ‘make it as time-consuming and expensive as possible for Trump to build his wall.’”

Cards Against Humanity says it mowed the land “and maintained it in its natural state, marking the edge of the lot with a fence and a ‘No Trespassing’ sign.” But instead of Trump taking over the land, Cards Against Humanity says the parcel was “interfered with and invaded” by Musk’s space company. The lawsuit includes pictures that, according to Cards Against Humanity, show the land when it was first purchased and after SpaceX construction equipment and materials were placed on the land.

  • fishos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Did I say it wasn’t illegal? I literally said it is.

    What I’m saying is CAD is pretending they were protecting the environment when in fact all they were doing was squatting a land title. They didn’t actually check on the land at all, which is something you might expect of someone who was actually trying to protect the land and wasn’t just pulling a big publicity stunt.

    So yeah, what I’m saying is the other guy is right: theyre making a big show of saying they care about the land after the fact, but before then did jackcall shit and never even checked on it.

    Elon can be a shithead and CAD could have just been doing a publicity stunt. Both can be true

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      They were planning on using the land legally make trunp struggle to build a wall there and leave it naturalized.

      Trunp didn’t build a wall on that land and it was still left to be nature. That’s pretty much 100% success rate on the desired outcome.

      Apparently you may not like nature but that doesn’t mean their use of the land was wrong.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        We promised we’d use every legal tool at our disposal to protect this land from bullies like…

        They did less than that actually, it’s this premise that they broke and is what I was talking about, they made a claim, they didn’t even do the bare minimum to protect it, when they said they would do anything.

        Look at every single discussion that missed this detail and says they did the bare minimum, that’s NOT what they promised to do with the money. Lots of people knew this was marketing and a waste of money, and were pointing this out, they never intended to protect it, just looked everything else they took your money and laughed. And that’s all I said.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Dude. Legal tool.

          They are doing that now taking Musk to court. That’s the legal tool. They didn’t say they would make it a playground.

          They promised to buy it and use it as a legal slowdown for idiots.

          I don’t know what you want here but you are deeply wrong and seem to just be bitter about something.