• Hildegarde@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Any competent contractor will include a termination clause in their contract. I have signed many contracts, and every single one had language to terminate the contract under some specific circumstances.

          Especially with a big company like uber they can bury a favorable termination clause somewhere in the contract, and you can’t exactly negotiate with an app if the terms aren’t to your liking.

          Companies have lawyers who get paid handsomely to write language to let them get away with things. There’s no way they would be deactivating contractors if it was opening them up to significant liabilities.

    • tjhart85@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      ‘Right to work’ has to do with not being required to be in a Union in order to get a job (ie, you have a right to work at a location whether you’re in the union or not).

      Right to work is bullshit and definitely helped in gutting the unions, but, I’m not sure how that has to do with anything to do with gig workers at all.

        • tjhart85@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do a quick Google search for “right to work vs at will employment” because you’ve got them mixed up.

          Additionally, the gig folks don’t have a contract that protects them and they’re being classified as contractors when (it’s being argued) they shouldn’t be. That’s literally the issue.

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t; this guy is just unaware of what ‘right to work’ means (admittedly, it’s a deliberately obtuse name), and seems to have no willingness to entertain the possibility that he might not know something.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right to work refers specifically to laws that make mandatory union membership illegal. It has absolutely nothing to do with at-will employment, termination, or anything relevant here.

    • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The idea of the “right to work” is bizarre to me. I am a USA citizen and it still confuses me. Isn’t our right to freedom from oppression, life, liberty, and happiness? I’m not sure how the right to work gets mixed up in there. I should be able to live happily if I work or not. Call me a commie but a strong social program (including free healthcare, free standardized education, and transit) and universal income would solve many of the issues the USA faces today. That all costs money of course but it doesn’t take an economist to see how much the USA spends on the military, and we are not even in an active war, so I think the budget could probably be finagled a little. Anyway I forgot what I was talking about, and all I’m saying is if the guy at the Wendy’s drive thru is replaced with a tablet for ordering he should still get paid.

    • czech@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, use your piles of cash and unlimited time to get what you’re already owed. Perfect system, you’re right.