Why did UI’s turn from practical to form over function?

E.g. Office 2003 vs Microsoft 365

Office 2003

It’s easy to remember where everything is with a toolbar and menu bar, which allows access to any option in one click and hold move.

Microsoft 365

Seriously? Big ribbon and massive padding wasting space, as well as the ribbon being clunky to use.

Why did this happen?

  • leekleak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly I like ribbons quite a lot as a design framework and hell, even padding can improve the UX, it’s just a shame that neither of these elements have been used well in a decade.

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        In a world that loves to tout “efficiency” sprawling GUIs and mouse-click-everything has drastically reduced efficiency when a keyboard + shortcuts + macros are far more efficient.

        The further we stray from the CLI the further we stray from God. CLI-nliness is next to Godliness.

        • oldfart@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d like to use good GUI programs designed for using with a keyboard, but it seems touch UI is the main theme for bigger developers these days, and keyboard is an afterthought at best

    • gsfraley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Agreed. I’m sure if I was heads down in Excel for years beforehand it would be a significant downgrade, but as a casual user, making better use of some of the more advanced features became so, SO much easier with the Ribbon.