reuters.com
www.reuters.com
      • pooperNickel@lemm.ee
        5·
        2 months ago

        You’d stop posting the minute everyone ignored you. Since you know the stakes of this election though, you know that won’t happen.

      • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
        1·
        2 months ago

        When you post articles that use data that is damn near a month out of date. Polls from August 25th? Or is it August 27th? Wasn’t that prior to the debate pounding that Harris gave Trump? On top of that where is this data from? What CAIR has posted at first glance does not include geographic breakdowns, so where did that data actually come from?

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
          1·
          2 months ago

          I didn’t write the Rueters news article. The date of the article shows “September 19, 20243:21 PM MDT.”

          If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it.

          • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
            1·
            2 months ago

            The date of the article is irrelevant, the article clearly shows the poll was made August 25 to August 27th.

            And I’m not going to bitch to Reuters about the audacity you had to post such nonsense data to a politics community.

              • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
                3·
                2 months ago

                And I just told you that I don’t have a problem with Reuters. I totally get that it is not high priority news and it took them a while to put out a report about it.

                I just told you that it’s you I have a problem with.

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    3·
    2 months ago

    They should withhold their vote for the person contributing to getting their family members killed. When Democrats lose again it will be their own doing, again.

    The cult of personality to the point of being willing to overlook genocide is insane

    • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
      1·
      2 months ago

      I think there are two key points to remember here:

      1. The GOP guy would endorse much worse policies for these folks than Harris.

      2. While Harris is too far off, pressure can also be exerted by voting for the right Senators, House Reps, and local/state officials. Unlike the GOP guy, we have a better chance of making Harris listen, if the right folks are below her.

      Ultimately, I respect everyone’s choice in voting and won’t pass judgement on doing so. But either way, I believe that the key remains building up the grassroots, as AOC and Ralph Nader have both stated recently.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        1·
        2 months ago

        This sounds like some of that push him left after the election bullshit we heard from liberals in 2020. The entire US government only responds to the donor class, there is no pushing anyone any direction without money.

        • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
          1·
          2 months ago

          This sounds like some of that push him left after the election … in 2020.

          Nader, you mean? Perhaps.

          The entire US government only responds to the donor class, there is no pushing anyone any direction without money.

          Yeah, was a problem even before Citizens United in 2010 - but that made it a gazillion times worse.

          after the election bullshit we heard from liberals in 2020.

          Uh, what? Citation needed?

          I remember a lot of BS after but it was from the GOP candidate - something about his winning the election and it getting stolen.