• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 months ago

    slashing the size of pints boost sales in an unexpected way

    Oh is it unexpected is it? Unexpected that selling people less quantity per unit would increase sales as people would probably still want the same quantity?

    This is weirdly pro business from the mirror

      • tabris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 months ago

        So the people who didn’t like the idea of short pints asked if they were messing with the serving size of wine, and when told no, they went with that. Everyone else just consumed the same amount as they would’ve, more or less.

      • ODuffer @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Probably as they were charging the same price as a pint, perhaps an exaggerating, but I suspect two halves wouldn’t be the same price as a pint was last week. Nobody likes to be ripped off.

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well that’s illegal, and I can literally point to the letter of the law:

    Some goods must be sold in fixed sizes known as ‘specified quantities’.

    Draught beer and cider: Third, half, two-thirds of a pint and multiples of half a pint

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They were serving 2/3, so it’s fully legal. Also they’re actually urging the govt to reduce sizes, not the pub owners directly.

      Granted, it would be nice if we had had more than a screenshot to go off on

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Surely a fine publication such as the Mirror wouldn’t publish a misleading headline?

        • sazey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh come on now, next you’re going to tell me Daily Star is not a shining beacon of journalistic integrity!

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    If they still want to call it a pint, they could go to the American definition (473ml, as opposed to 568ml). Beyond that, they could go to the New South Wales schooner (¾ of a pint, or 425ml). Or, you know, go metric and serve beer in decilitres as on the continent (400ml or 500ml is a reasonable size for a beer), though that may be politically impossible in the post-Brexit environment.

  • ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    I do hope this isn’t a road to the term ‘pint’ just becoming a generic name rather than actually holding meaning. I remember when a 99 referred to the price!

  • CodandChips @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Two thirds of a pint please, so that’s two thirds of the cost of a pint yeah? So cheaper right? Right???

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t mind a schooner, but hell am I paying full pint prices for 2/3 of a pint. I’d be pissed off rather than pissed drunk.