Blåhaj Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
just_another_person@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · 9 months ago

Titan crew said 'all good here' before submersible imploded

www.bbc.com

external-link
message-square
29
link
fedilink
150
external-link

Titan crew said 'all good here' before submersible imploded

www.bbc.com

just_another_person@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · 9 months ago
message-square
29
link
fedilink
Two-week public inquiry sees last communication before deep-sea disaster near wreck of Titanic last year.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Wirlocke
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    9 months ago

    It was, infact, not all good there.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    9 months ago

    • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nah, I’ll just watch Iron Lung, thanks.

    • JWBananas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Thanks, I hate it

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      James Earl Jones

      :(

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If subnautica taught me anything, he voiced the actual sub.

  • toast@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 months ago

    After decades of journalists attaching the suffix “gate” to anything even remotely scandalous, I was disappointed that I never heard anyone embrace the full stupidity of this practice by referring to this story as “Oceangate-gate”

    • toast@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      After some thought, I’ve decided that we should refer to this apparent lapse by journalists as “Oceangate-gate-gate”

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.netBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 months ago

    Now… Which dialogue choice did he take?

    1. “All good here”

    2. “All good here” (Lie)

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      To be fair, at the exact moment he said “All good here” it probably was. It just became very ungood, very quickly.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    All good here 👍💥

  • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    It was good

  • sramder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Followed shortly by ‘oh shit’ and ‘we dropped two weights’ then ‘guys, it’s getting kind of wet in here…’

    Just kidding, mostly.

    Serious question: how does a submarine know how much it weighs?

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      9 months ago

      Explosive decompression is almost instantaneous at that depth. They wouldn’t have had a chance to even blink.

      • qfe0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        9 months ago

        Implosive compression?

      • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        Wouldn’t it have happened so fast that they never even registered the pain of being crushed? Like, the signal from the body never even reached the brain, it was so fast.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          9 months ago

          So fast they’d not even be able to register what was happening. Not a bad way to go.

      • sramder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah, it was definitely intended as humor an attempt at levity.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s when your spaceship shreds apart.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=j8XgLX5FLdY

      • Hule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, the ocean was decompressed by a tiny bit…

      • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Explosive decompression

        Doubly backwards

    • sinkingship@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      I assume that the submarine producer gives stats like empty weight from which the current weight can be calculated.

      However, weight isn’t the important thing in a sub. It’s the weight to volume ratio, or buoyancy.

      A sub sinks when buoyancy is negative and rises if the buoyancy is positive.

      There are three common ways to achieve the changing buoyancy: the most simple one is a vessel with positive buoyancy adding droppable weights until the buoyancy is negative.

      Other ways are a neutral buoyancy vessel that uses it’s engine power to push itself up or down. Or a vessel that can change it’s buoyancy by filling up tanks with water (to reduce buoyancy below neutral) and blow them out with air or other gases lighter than water (to raise buoyancy above neutral). A combination of several methods is also possible.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Amazing how intact the back half is given, you know, explosive decompression.

    • Arbiter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      Actually this is the opposite of explosive decompression.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 months ago

        Implosive compression.

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, but we required the answer in the form of a question. So, no points for you.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyzBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      When a car crashes head first into a brick wall, the rear bumper is usually salvageable.

    • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think the rear portion was more solid, so just not as many hollow portions to collapse.

science@lemmy.world

science@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science@lemmy.world

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 797 users / day
  • 2.26K users / week
  • 4.28K users / month
  • 9.23K users / 6 months
  • 149 local subscribers
  • 19.5K subscribers
  • 2.03K Posts
  • 16.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • m3t00🌎@lemmy.world
  • Joleee@lemmy.world
  • laverabe@lemmy.world
  • DeadPand@midwest.social
  • laverabe@lemmy.zip
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org