According to conservatives of any colors it’s every time a woman does anything other than being a mother of 7 in a monogamous patriarchical relationships. Especially if she works as any type of sex worker.
That isn’t to say that sex work isn’t ripe with problems with realyl occurring sex trafficking and otger problems like women being forced to participate due to the capitalist hell they are living in, but for some reason we are having this conversation under the post of a woman doing it on her owh will, so there is that.
But all of it doesn’t realy matter I guess because I suspect the real reason for this post is to simp for putin by justifying his aggression with the usual “Ukraine bad because women are showing tits to people for money”
Your reading comprehension isn’t great. The problem isn’t that this woman is a prostitute, it’s that it’s normalizing the framing of “these men at war need access to sex,” which if you think about it for even a few seconds should raise red flags. If it is a “need,” then it is “necessary” to a war effort that it is accounted for, and suddenly you see the implication of a military prostitution industry, the existence of which would be a threat rather than a boon to impoverished women because, for this industry to be supplied, the powers that be will be sure there’s a minimum number of people who are desperate enough to sign up or else a good enough PR covering for what is actually slavery (such as corner cases of, to pick a totally random example, some woman flying halfway around the world to prostitute herself for free).
Who was forced into it? Well, other than people raped by the invaders, but I suspect you’re not talking about those
What is human trafficking for 200, Alex?
According to conservatives of any colors it’s every time a woman does anything other than being a mother of 7 in a monogamous patriarchical relationships. Especially if she works as any type of sex worker.
That isn’t to say that sex work isn’t ripe with problems with realyl occurring sex trafficking and otger problems like women being forced to participate due to the capitalist hell they are living in, but for some reason we are having this conversation under the post of a woman doing it on her owh will, so there is that.
But all of it doesn’t realy matter I guess because I suspect the real reason for this post is to simp for putin by justifying his aggression with the usual “Ukraine bad because women are showing tits to people for money”
Your reading comprehension isn’t great. The problem isn’t that this woman is a prostitute, it’s that it’s normalizing the framing of “these men at war need access to sex,” which if you think about it for even a few seconds should raise red flags. If it is a “need,” then it is “necessary” to a war effort that it is accounted for, and suddenly you see the implication of a military prostitution industry, the existence of which would be a threat rather than a boon to impoverished women because, for this industry to be supplied, the powers that be will be sure there’s a minimum number of people who are desperate enough to sign up or else a good enough PR covering for what is actually slavery (such as corner cases of, to pick a totally random example, some woman flying halfway around the world to prostitute herself for free).
Look up WW2 ‘V girls.’ Ukraine didn’t invent anything.
Yep, even their genocidal fascist ideology is something they cribbed from the Italians and the Germans. Real loser country post-1991.
“People were exploited for sexual relations in the past so it’s okay to do now”/s
So, you didn’t look it up. USA ‘V girls’ were 100% volunteer.
You joined a leftist group to defend prostitution. Go back to watching your Fox News and quit bothering us