60 million apps keep getting pushed on us, and everyone wants their own… Every restaurant, gorcery store, etc.

Would it not be feasible to install all of those Kroger, Gas Stations, bloat, bloat, bloat apps on an app Server that we just have a remote access to them like a thin client from our phone in a singular app of shortcuts (look like a folder, directory) So all the apps stay installed and don’t use resources on the phone. Which keeps storage requirements down on the local device and means when you go into another device you can just log in and have access to all the apps already signed in and how you left them.

Does anyone know if there is already such a setup?

It wouldn’t work well with things like streaming services, but it could still cover a lot of day to day apps I don’t really want to have to have on my device.

  • damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Part of what you’ve described is market economics. They want your loyalty and they want to track your purchases to sell that data to advertisers. Do they need an app for that? Absolutely not. They can and do host websites with the same deals and all you have to do is login. The reason they push you to their app is because either the app is something they spent a bunch of money on and want to increase customer adoption. Or, they have added massive new tracking capabilities and want to spy on their users on behalf of advertisers, so they need you on their app.

    None of this is related to the technical aspects of this question. In fact, most of these companies would resist you installing their app on an “app server” simply because then they wouldn’t be able to track your location and other phone details easily. Defeating the purpose of your idea.

    Oh, and as for the watermelon - there’s a sweet spot between the prices which is usually $5 if you use their loyalty card and not their app. That’s the price you pay for your phone’s privacy and resources - a buck. Not a fair trade, but it is what it is.

    p.s. I hear you about the three prices thing. It’s frustrating. Grocery shopping is not simple. It’s all about hunting for deals and accepting the time vs money trade off. I’m sorry you are in this situation. I am too.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, the location data wouldn’t function right as you said. They wouldn’t know you were at the store on 5th Street if the app is running on a machine at home I suppose. Could always manually search it.

      Not your fault we are in that situation. Hope your life comes into many a cheap watermelon.

      • andyburke@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Part of the reason for all this bullshit is people will just do it instead of going to a different place that doesn’t require bullshit but maybe costs a little more. 🤷‍♂️

        This seems like your bed? If you’re not willing to go to a place that doesn’t do this to you, I guess you just gotta lie in it.

    • trailee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s also what the phone number club card has been about for the past few decades. I still type in the public phone number for my local store every time (after noticing that’s what the clerk used one time when I was “having trouble” entering my number on the pin pad). Grocery app on my phone? Hell no.