• Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s not impossible, however. While the BBC indeed has a lot of problems on its own, it’s actually been relatively well separated from the British government. They’ve had more issues with covering up for their own celebrities like Jimmy Savile, rather than covering for the government.

    But yes, journalists need to eat and they’re being paid so little that it results in the kind of media landscape we have now. We no longer have a host of long-form investigative journalists who are given months to research and develop stories. The 24 hour news cycle has reduced everything to minimal impact and journalists having to pump out stories without real depth.

    • WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Ok…. And you assume this will be true… if an American government… who established a Russian asset as president, is attempting to defund private schools so that they can give money to certain religious orgs and push a Christian message, who is trying to privatize the post office, and who refuse to answer to war crimes is a good environment to take control of the news media?

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I didn’t argue that at all, but you do you on putting words in my mouth.

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I didn’t attempt to. Just saying. You said it wasn’t impossible for government owed news media to dutifully report against the government. Maybe not, but our country’s kinda stacked the deck against that