hydroptic@sopuli.xyz to 196 · 5 months agoWho's rule?sopuli.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1156
arrow-up1156external-linkWho's rule?sopuli.xyzhydroptic@sopuli.xyz to 196 · 5 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareBuglefingers@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·5 months agoWell, that’s a thing on the internet apparently. Neat. -_-
minus-squaretoynbee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoNot sure “neat” is the word I’d use. Its existence doesn’t upset me, but I wouldn’t mind if it didn’t exist.
minus-squareBuglefingers@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoNeat in the macabre sense. Because while it’s disturbing for sure, it’s interesting someone put that much effort into production effort of such a thing.
Well, that’s a thing on the internet apparently. Neat. -_-
Not sure “neat” is the word I’d use. Its existence doesn’t upset me, but I wouldn’t mind if it didn’t exist.
Neat in the macabre sense. Because while it’s disturbing for sure, it’s interesting someone put that much effort into production effort of such a thing.
Well, hard to argue with that.