• chumbalumber
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depends on if you’re using water to include types of water (if, like a maniacal madman, you have mixed Evian, Buxton and Harrogate mineral water into one jug). Then ‘i mixed fewer waters’ or ‘there are fewer waters in that glass’ would be valid.

      To be clear: I’m not the person you replied to, just someone who finds it quite interesting (in the same way that the plural fishes is valid if you’re talking about different species of fish).

      And yes, I know prescriptivism is bad, but also it is quite fun.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Those are homonyms. Water versus waters. The second one is metaphorical.

        I did enjoy your comment and you sound like you’ve had some linguistic training.

        • chumbalumber
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Eh, you wouldn’t use the noun water to refer to atoms of water. ‘How many waters are there?’ to refer to atoms of water is the statement of someone deranged

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Water only exists as atoms. There is no non-discrete water, it is inherently in reality discrete.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I believe there are about 55.508435 moles of H2O in a liter of water at sea level (basically assuming 1 liter of water = 1kg of water)

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Atoms of water are measured in moles. Atoms are discrete units, a mole is just a certain number of them

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            So you understand then why water is uncountable but atoms are not. Congratulations. What a strange pedantic hill you choosing to die on.

            • sem
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              No, water is countable. Unfortunately you are incorrect.

              EDIT: the word “water” isn’t usually made plural, but water the substance can absolutely be measured and counted.

              • stoly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Sorry but some nouns (ie cats) can be counted while others (ie air) cannot be.

                • sem
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Language is a flexible thing. I heard this in a children’s game of tag, “Octopi, Octopi, can I cross your waters?”

                  And you can count air too, either by volume or amount of molecules.

                  • stoly@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I think you should just go and read the wikipedia articles on countable and noncountable nouns and stop arguing with a literal inguist.