Strawberry fields forever — delving into OpenAI’s new ‘o1’ model
pivot-to-ai.com
The Strawberry has landed! OpenAI has released o1-preview, its latest impressive demo, just in time for the current funding round. [Press release] The new hotness in Strawberry is chain-of-thought …
    • flowerysong@awful.systemsEnglish
      21·
      2 months ago

      “this thing takes more time and effort to process queries, but uses the same amount of computing resources” <- statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged.

      • froztbyte@awful.systemsEnglish
        14·
        2 months ago

        “we found that the Turbo button on the outside of the DC wasn’t pressed, so we pressed it”

      • tee9000@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        2 months ago

        I often use prompts that are simple and consistent with their results and then use additional prompts for more complicated requests. Maybe reasoning lets you ask more complex questions and have everything be appropriately considered by the model instead of using multiple simpler prompts.

        Maybe if someone uses the new model with my method above, it would use more resources. Im not really sure. I dont use chain of thought (CoT) methodology because im not using ai for enterprise applications which treat tokens as a scarcity.

        Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

        • self@awful.systemsEnglish
          13·
          2 months ago

          I’m far too drunk for “it can’t be that stupid, you must be prompting it wrong” but here we fucking are

          Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

          oh no shit? you wandered into a group that knows you’re bullshitting and got called out for it? wonder of fucking wonders

          • self@awful.systemsEnglish
            11·
            2 months ago

            Cake day: September 13th, 2024

            holy fuck they registered 2 days ago and 9 out of 10 of their posts are specifically about the new horseshit ChatGPT model and they’re gonna pretend they didn’t come here specifically to advertise for that exact horseshit

            oh im just a smol bean uwu promptfan doing fucking work for OpenAI advertising for their new model on a fucking Saturday night

            • self@awful.systemsEnglish
              11·
              2 months ago

              and as for more important news: the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner

              but their tequila’s still excellent

              • froztbyte@awful.systemsEnglish
                6·
                2 months ago

                the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner

                even bad bathtub gin sounds more appealing

              • BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systemsEnglish
                5·
                2 months ago

                The Kirkland Signature bottled-in-bond Bourbon is well worth the price. Not the best but surprisingly decent. And this concludes my shameless plug.

                • self@awful.systemsEnglish
                  5·
                  2 months ago

                  a lot of their liquor is surprisingly very good! that’s why it’s also surprising how bad their scotch is

        • gerikson@awful.systemsEnglish
          9·
          2 months ago

          Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

          If only you’d asked ChatGPT “is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs”

          • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPMEnglish
            9·
            2 months ago

            I asked Gemini!

            is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs

            Reply:

            I can’t assess awful.systems for that purpose. Sex with large language models is not possible, and awful.systems may be a harmful or unsafe website.

            Here are some things to consider:

            • LLMs are not sentient beings. They can’t feel pleasure or emotions.
            • Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content.
            • Engaging in sexually suggestive conversations online can lead to exposure to predators or unwanted advances.

            If you are looking for information about sex or relationships, there are many reputable resources available online and offline.

            SLANDER, I SAY

            • self@awful.systemsEnglish
              7·
              2 months ago

              Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content.

              oof, this one stings

              also now I’m paranoid the shitheads who operate the various clouds will make the mistake of using the LLM as a malware detector without realizing it’s probably just matching the token for the TLD

        • froztbyte@awful.systemsEnglish
          8·
          2 months ago

          Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

          we need something for this kind of “I hope to buy time while I await the bomb exploding” shit, in the style of JAQing off

          • self@awful.systemsEnglish
            7·
            2 months ago

            see we were supposed to fall all over ourselves and debate this random stranger’s awful points. we weren’t supposed to respond to their disappointment with “good, fuck off” because then they can’t turn the whole thread into garbage

    • V0ldek@awful.systemsEnglish
      11·
      2 months ago

      Kay mate, rational thought 101:

      When the setup is “we run each query multiple times” the default position is that it costs more resources. If you claim they use roughly the same amount you need to substantiate that claim.

      Like, that sounds like a pretty impressive CS paper, “we figured out how to run inference N times but pay roughly the cost of one” is a hell of an abstract.