• tusker@monero.townOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This has not worked. It is time for a solution on the protocol level to handicap giant irresponsible pools in some way.

    • IP2@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It has not worked yet. P2ppool is steadily growing still, new miners have no reason to join a pool. Big system administrators will keep flexing on pools every now and then I guess, botnets too. I don’t see us worrying once p2pool gets top 3 or thereabouts.

    • k4r4b3y@karapara.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay. Walk me through this. How do you enforce the use of p2pool on the protocol level? How would you even distinguish a pool operation against a solo mining operation?

      Wownero tried to eliminate the pool mining. But they enforced solo mining on the protocol level.

      So, how would one enforce p2pool mining on the protocol level?

      • Gargari@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just found out about wownero (memecoin), they better put that effort to improve monero :/

        • monerobull@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not wasted effort, it is basically like a testnet for Monero where bleeding edge and novel tech can be tested without much impact in case of failure.

      • crab@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        adding p2pool block hash and something signed by private spend key to the block requirements should accomplish this? whether or not its a good idea is another thing