My father told me he wanted to make USB flash drives of all the scanned and digitized family photos and other assorted letters and mementos. He planned to distribute them to all family members hoping that at least one set would survive. When I explained that they ought to be recipes to new media every N number of years or risk deteriorating or becoming unreadable (like a floppy disk when you have no floppy drive), he was genuinely shocked. He lost interest in the project that he’d thought was so bullet proof.

  • TechSquidTV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    Im really hoping, waiting, for a good dense long-term storage medium. It doesn’t have to be fast, but large, cheap, and durable. I want a way to backup my plex library, or even, daily backups of documents and project files, and I don’t want to think about them ever again.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      Tape is cheap and durable if you store it properly. Except the tape drive is expensive af.

      Microsoft is working on glass storage. A glass plate can last 10,000 years according to Microsoft. Hopefully that tech will get miniaturized and available to consumers within our lifetimes.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            It seemed like the person I was talking to didn’t. The implication was that tape was viable as long-term storage. It isn’t. I’ve seen tapes rot after a year. DATs were especially prone to that, but even things like 2" multitrack audio tape can go bad that quickly.

    • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      M-Disk is rated to last like 100 1000 years. They are also working on a 125 Terabyte CD. Optical storage is the way to go.

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Punch cards? Stored correctly there’s no reason they couldn’t last many human lifetimes. But… Yeah it’ll take a while to encode everything.

      I would have thought that with modern technology we could come up with something like punch cards but more space/time efficient. Physical storage of data - only one write cycle of course, but extremely durable. Even just the same system as punch cards but using tiny, tiny holes very close together on a roll of paper. Could be punched or read by a machine at high speed (compared to a regular punch card, presumably still Ber slow compared to flash media).

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Paper doesn’t last centuries. Anyway, punched cards don’t have a storage density that’s adequate for modern data volumes. You need something that’ll durably store nanometre-sized marks.

        • BluesF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes that’s what I’m thinking, some modernised physical data storage technique.

    • SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It certainly would make planning the dang home lab easier. Im in a small place! I don’t have room for all the stuff i wanna play with!