Really you don’t need to read more than one chart:

If you vote for anyone other than Harris, you’re voting for Trump:

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The underlying fallacy, IMO, is that people think the purpose of elections is to send a message to the government, instead of choosing the government (and that all political problems can be solved by sending the right message).

    The best way to approach an election is to determine the most likely scenario in which your vote would actually decide the outcome (which in practice means a choice between the two frontrunners in a FPTP system), and then consider what difference that would make in terms of actual policy (rather than symbolism).

    And recognize that this alone won’t fix all the problems with government—that will require other types of involvement beyond voting.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      Unfortunately, too many radicals on both sides have over-inflated senses of their own self importance. “We’re sending a message!” Yeah, no, no you aren’t. You’re actively doing nothing in order to make yourself feel good. That’s it.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        On the nose. The ones screaming the loudest about Democrats supporting genocide. Or saying something stupid like blue Maga, trying to deflect from the fact that they themselves are the most maga like of any on the left. Culturally slave to Virtue signaling no matter how much it hurts them. Get an instant down vote.

        If we’re going to send them a message. We should be running against them at the local level across the nation. Or better yet, coopting the party and make our candidate theirs. 3rd party presidential candidates are an exercise in pyrrhic self flagellation.