I don’t know about y’all, but I will not ever be going shopping here.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    6 days ago

    Kroger promises to lower grocery prices by $1 billion after artificially inflating them by $3 billion.

  • teamevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    6 days ago

    Fuckin lies… No for profit business ever said hey let’s spend a bunch of money to buy another business to make less money.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    7 days ago

    Why would anyone trust them right after the price gouging during the pandemic and long after logistics had adapted?

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    6 days ago

    They aren’t even saying that.

    After the merger closes, Kroger will invest $1 billion to lower Albertsons’ prices, consistent with Kroger’s track record of fighting inflation and providing value to customers.

    So, they’re going to invest $1 billion to lower prices (which the writer speculates will be through “increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain”).

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 days ago

    “You should let us reduce competition in the grocery space, because with less competition prices will be lower.”

    That’s a bold take.

    • Zess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Walmart has been doing it for decades to achieve its low prices. The problem isn’t that it won’t work, it’s just still a shitty thing to squeeze every cent from your suppliers.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Wal*Mart does definitely squeeze their suppliers, and it does have relatively low prices, but it’s hardly a charity. It squeezes suppliers, not so that it can supply customers with low prices but so that it can provide profits to investors.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Economies of scale allow for lower costs, not lower prices. Lower prices are a choice that companies make, and it’s a choice they don’t have to make if they don’t have competitors.

  • aaaaace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    Force them to break up into all their constituent companies.

    Competition and the free market, also free of M&A’s, will help pricing for everyone, including suppliers and customers.

    Be great if we could elect anti-merger reps.

  • ɔiƚoxɘup@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    First they added self checkout to reduce headcount, then came the price fixing/gouging. Then their shrink increased because people got tired of being fucked by Kroger. Then they had that shady deal with the UFCW. Then they decided to treat everyone that shops there like a criminal.

    I’ll never return.