Hey guys, it was brought up in a report that NSFW tags should be applied to posts depicting drug use. What do you guys think? I could see it either way and thought you guys might like to weigh in on it. I personally don’t find it particularly offensive but my work environments have never been the type to react strongly to something like this popping up on screen (I think they might be more upset about being on Lemmy at all). Currently there is no rule, and I am fine with that, unless feedback indicates the community would rather play it safe and require the NSFW flag.

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    My rule of tumb: if someone is walking by would they stop and backtrack and go “WTF are you looking at at work?!” if no then it’s not NSFW. If it’s just text it’s not NSFW. ASCII art not withstanding.

  • Nicht BurningTurtle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    No, depictions of drug use aren’t nsfw. And if we start censoring it, why not also start censoring other relatively harmless concepts like depictions of weapons or cursewords? We don’t want this, and trying to enforce it would add additional, unnecessary work to both you and the admins.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    Text is never going to need the tag. To the contrary, if you’re at work reading text posts, and it’s tagged NSFW, it draws the eye more.

    Tagging text posts would defeat the entire purpose of the tag in its useful purpose.

    Drug use isn’t NSFW anyway, not in images or text.

    • Aa!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      What do you think the tag is for?

      People at work don’t (shouldn’t) click on NSFW-tagged content. If it draws your eye even more, then I assume you don’t browse from work.

      How would it defeat the purpose to tag content that most workplaces would not be okay with? If you don’t mind seeing the content, then the tag might entice you. People at work will recognize it and not click

  • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    I appreciate the many voices here. It seems like consensus is that the tag is not needed as a general rule. I want to be clear, also, that the NSFW tag is not censorship, but also doesn’t seem necessary either. Thank you guys for chiming in!

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I say if you label something not safe for work because of a drug, then it must be for all drugs including caffeine. No talks about coffee at work, or doughnuts; get those added sugars out of here. Far more people die in America from heart issues than people from eating edible gummies. Why would you ban one and not the other.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    are we talking a joint? if so then it should apply to alcohol and cigarrettes. I can understand for injections. some folks are neddlephobes.

    • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The original question came up over snorting drugs through a rolled up C note but would also likely encompass shooting heroin or smoking meth/crack. But the consensus appears to be not to ask for an NSFW tag at this time. So that will be our stance unless you guys decide things are going too far and you want the tag included on posts with that sort of content.

  • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I suspect that this may be partially a result of a recent post of mine that some may considered to be in bad taste. So this response is likely to be a bit biased.

    For what it is worth, I considered tagging mine as NSFW but ultimately decided it was not necessary. I thought the image was very clearly a staged representation of drug use. Similar to how the Eric Andre meme is clearly a staged representation of murder. Further, there was no blood nor any indication of physical injury and I liked it to an image of somebody smoking pot or drinking to excess.

    Do I think drug use alone require a NSFW tag? No.

    Should drug coupled with blood, gore, physical injury, exploitation, etc? Possibly.

      • Aa!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        An NSFW tag isn’t censorship, it’s a warning for people at WORK. if you don’t use it for what it’s for, that’s not working people problems, that’s your fault.

        • Oisteink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah. Or that was the original meaning like 15 years back. Now there are hide nsfw settings in most clients and some of them where thats the default

          • Aa!@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Which you can easily turn off if you don’t browse Lemmy at work.

            Just because you don’t use the tag for its intended purpose doesn’t mean everyone doesn’t. The tag has a clear purpose, denoted by what it stands for. Most people with adult jobs understand its purpose. Don’t ruin the tag’s purpose for the rest of us by devaluing it

            • Oisteink@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              That tag covers a lot of different things. This has been debated on reddit for 15 years, with no progress on other types of tags. It’s the only one, so while it says “work” it includes stuff a lot of us don’t need/want in general. It’s there to censor stuff

              • Aa!@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                It isn’t censorship if you can just turn it off and see everything. It’s a warning for people who want to browse at work but not view content that can get them in trouble

                Just turn it off and ignore it if it doesn’t apply to you. The rest of us want the tag to be used for its purpose.

                • Oisteink@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You base this on some sort of research into usage of nsfw tagging or just pull shit out of your ass?

  • trolololol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well mate this tag is more useful to me around kids than in the office. Perhaps because I’m 100% wfh.

    Anyways, I appreciate it also with gore images like certain Ukraine and Gaza pictures. So it’s not just about work for me and others.

    Now if we had a mandatory tag like this for politics I’d do the big brains meme and be soooo happy.

    • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Politics aren’t allowed in !memes. We do try to catch it when a political meme is posted.

  • HN82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    When in doubt, use NSFW. I don’t feel good when people make memes about crack or users because it directly affects me. I stopped following a community because of that. Thanks for asking anyway.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think this applies to a lot of things including memes that have any kind of adult theme like sex and violence

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      But seriously tho, yeah, NSFW in the absence of another more specific tag.

      Some people are recovering from addiction and stuff, good to give them a way to filter it out

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it would be safer to have an NSFW tag, especially considering the different ways people use drugs and the various effects of it.