• tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    when Snaps are just one example of Canonical being antithetical to free software values

    No they are not. They are just another way of packaging apps that is specific to Ubuntu (and distros that can run Snap). The format has its flaws but calling it antithetical makes no sense.

    Also, I like Snaps. Ubuntu comes with Snap pre-installed. So I won’t be using Mint.

    • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is the Snap backend available and open-source? If not, then it’s antithetical to software freedom because Canonical is trying to close their users into a walled garden in the ways that Apple and Google are with their app stores.

      There are plenty of software packaging systems that work just as well or better than Snap, and promote software freedom (Flatpak, Appimage, or even just traditional package managers). By using and promoting Snap over these, you are working against the growth of digital rights.

      • tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Snap works great for a lot of CLI software. All of the FOSS Snaps also publish their source code of how they are packaged. https://github.com/nextcloud-snap/nextcloud-snap , and the snap client app is FOSS too.

        I don’t care that the server is controlled by Canonical. Most Flatpaks are on Flathub and it’s not a problem.

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t care that the server is controlled by Canonical. Most Flatpaks are on Flathub and it’s not a problem.

          If flathub became a problem, people could easily and openly switch another server.