• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Was she part of the administration that repealed the restrictions on Israeli settlements on Palestinian territory, or the one that reinstated them? Did Netanyahu name a settlement after her in Golan Heights as a way of thanking her for repealing the restrictions?

      Did she say that Israel needs to finish the job and stop recording proof of bombings, or did she say she supports a ceasefire so the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, security, freedom and self determination?

      Yeah. Just as hard.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        No she’s part of the administration doing the literal Genocide on Palestinians.

        I’m sure you care so much about Jerusalem though.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m sure you care so much about Jerusalem though.

          Why would you assume that? I’m agnostic, not that I owe you any explanation.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Okay, then if there’s really only a choice between the two and they both support genocide just as much as the other, genocide doesn’t really have any impact on whether you should vote for one or the other and maybe vote for the one who isn’t racist, isn’t a fascist, isn’t an idiot, isn’t going to die of a heart attack in office, and doesn’t have a couchfucker as a VP.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Jill Stein supports a full arms embargo on israel. The race certainly isn’t between Genocide or Genocide.

        • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          You vote for Jill Stein and Trump or Kamala will still be president and nothing changes for Israel. But at least you will feel better.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Actually if Jill Stein gets 5% of the votes then Greens will get $10 million in funding for their 2028 campaign so it definitely changes things.

            • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              after this election where Trump or Harris will be president. Will very likely be too late to do anything for Palestine in 4 years, which will be no guarantee of a third party option either.

              All the while Trump may be in office because 5% of the vote went to Stein instead of harris and now not only.palestine suffers but also women, black and Hispanic Americans, the lower to middle class, and the lgbtq+ community.

              • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                after this election where Trump or Harris will be president. Will very likely be too late to do anything for Palestine in 4 years, which will be no guarantee of a third party option either.

                All the more reason to get everyone to vote for Green then since Harris and Trump will make certain of the destruction of Palestine.

                • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I fully support getting rid of the two party system, but at this point in time it’s a fantasy. Maybe next election when Trump isn’t going to be the consequences is where Jill Stein can get her votes.

                  Unfortunately the Republicans may find someone even worse than trump next time.