The father of the teen suspected in the Georgia school shooting has been arrested, the Georgia bureau of investigation has said.

Colin Gray, 54, was arrested by the bureau in connection to the shooting at Apalachee high school. Colin is the father of Colt Gray, the 14-year-old who is suspected of fatally shooting two students and two teachers with an assault-style rifle at the high school on Wednesday.

He is charged with four counts of involuntary manslaughter, two counts of second degree murder and eight counts of cruelty to children, the Georgia bureau said.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    3 months ago

    its about time people that dont secure their human killing devices be prosecuted when those devices are ultimately used to kill humans.

    lets hope this is repeated every time we have to pay the 2nd amendment tax with dead childen.

    • Entertainmeonly
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      3 months ago

      It wasn’t that he didn’t secure the gun. It’s that he gifted it to the teen directly.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        does it matter? no it does not.

        if you dont secure your human killing devices, and it ends up with dead/hurt humans you should be prosecuted.

        e. and honestly, he absolutely failed to secure the device he was responsible for. the method he used is superfluous

        • Entertainmeonly
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          3 months ago

          It does matter. The teenager was the owner. Even if the gun was secure it would have been accessible to the teenager. The gun was gifted to the teenager and that is the problem. The teenager should not have position of a fire arm, that we both agree on. Stating that the gun should have been secure completely ignores the actual scenario here.

          • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            It remained unclear how the shooter obtained the weapon.

            id put money on the fact that teen did not buy an AR. The human killing remains the responsibility of the purchaser.

            had the gift been to another adult, you might have an argument.

            you should in absolutely no capacity be able to gift an AR to a 14 year old and claim no responsibility.

            • Entertainmeonly
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              But that’s why the father is being prosecuted. Because he ultimately gifted the firearm to his teenager. Your original statement was about unsecured firearms. I was pointing out this is not a case of “teenager breaks into house and gets a gun.” This is about a father letting their 14 year old have a gun.

                • Lupus@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Afaik there is no state where an underage person is allowed to handle assault style fully automatic weapons without the supervision of a parent or legal guardian. So even if it is his gun, it falls under parental supervision until 18 years old.

                  Semi automatic or hunting rifle is a little more murky.

                  Anyway I think that your comment nailed it - a person under 18 was able to obtain and handle a gun without supervision is a failure to secure.

          • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Was the teenager the owner? Can a 14 year old legally possess a firearm like that independent of their parent(s)?

            I always imagined it was similar to when a parent buys a car and “gifts” it to the child. The car still belongs to the parent, at least until the kid is old enough to take ownership of it.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    As a Pro Life Republican trying to Protect The Children this is HORRIBLE! This INFRINGES on his Second Amendment RIGHTS!

  • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    After beinv convicted, I want a Barbara Walters’s style interview with him crying and begging for leniency. Play that shit on a loop after every NRA commercial, convention, interview etc. Make people understand this is shit and needs to change.