• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Well, the theory is that persistence hunting was one of the main hunting strategies during a large portion of human evolution before ranged weapons were invented. So it may well have relevance for distribution of labor between men and women during most of human prehistory, and therefore our evolutionary psychology.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      persistence hunting was one of the main hunting strategies during a large portion of human evolution before ranged weapons were invented

      How do ranged weapons invalidate persistence hunting?

      If you’re trying to chase down an animal till it’s exhausted, I think you’d want to be throwing stuff at it to injure or at least to keep it moving.

      Also, was there a time before ranged weapons? As soon as humans have weapons we have ranged weapons because we can throw. Atlatls and slings - tools to help you throw sticks and stones - wouldn’t have been developed if we weren’t already throwing sticks and stones at things.

      • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        How do ranged weapons invalidate persistence hunting?

        Even with a modern bow it’s still really difficult to sneak close enough to a deer to reliably make a kill shot. You’re not going to sneak close enough to poke it with a spear and with game that size, throwing rocks is not really an option either because that wont kill it. Something like axis deer is quick enough to even dodge a modern arrow.

        The reality is that the animal will notice you and it will out-sprint you as well but it wont outrun a human on a long distance. When the animal is exhausted and no more able to run, then you can then stick your spear in it.