• molave@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Companies have the same rights as a private person to not have their stuff distributed if they don’t permit it. How do you proceed from that?

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 months ago

      A business is not a person. They should not get all the benefits of being a person with none of the negatives, and then also get all the benefits of being a business with none of the negatives.

      • molave@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Which, to our dismay, is not how the current law works. Only a law change will bring what you describe.

    • ReluctantZen@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Idk, I personally don’t think it’s fair to throw a hissyfit about it when they don’t even bother making it available, especially since the monetary damages are negligable. They’re not losing customers when they never had them.

    • Rozaŭtuno
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just because they have the right (or more precisely: they gave themselves the right through lobbying), it doesn’t mean it’s fair. They’re literally gatekeeping culture.