Leaflet@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agoFirefox will consider a Rust implementation of JPEG-XL (with Google's help)github.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1266cross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.mljpegxl@lemmy.world
arrow-up1266external-linkFirefox will consider a Rust implementation of JPEG-XL (with Google's help)github.comLeaflet@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square9fedilinkcross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.mljpegxl@lemmy.world
minus-squareshadowtofu@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up52·edit-24 months agoI took my existing JPEG file, compressed it using JXL, 15% smaller. Then I decompressed it again into JPEG. The file was bit-for-bit identical to the original file (same hash). Blew my mind! Directly using JXL is even better of course.
minus-squareEiri@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up9·4 months agoSo it’s called xlarge… And it makes files smaller. Why.
minus-squareshadowtofu@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up13·4 months agoThe same amount of JXL gives you more image than JPEG? Also, it supports ridiculous resolutions (terapixel).
I took my existing JPEG file, compressed it using JXL, 15% smaller.
Then I decompressed it again into JPEG. The file was bit-for-bit identical to the original file (same hash). Blew my mind!
Directly using JXL is even better of course.
So it’s called xlarge… And it makes files smaller.
Why.
The same amount of JXL gives you more image than JPEG? Also, it supports ridiculous resolutions (terapixel).